A 22-year-old Afghan national.

Don't worry folks. Apparently there are government tenders available for those who can offer their hotels to house migrants. Contracts that run into the 2030s.

MMmm, I thought the government had committed to stopping the use of hotels by 2029?

Can't even properly manage migrants, what a farce.
 
That fruit cake that was deported back to Ethiopia apparently kicked off and refused to get on the plane

They had to bung him £500 as an incentive :giggle:

Incentive should be a tazor
Hand cuffs
Ankle cuffs
Straight jacket

And a smack

If he refuses to board the plane
Should have one of them anaesthetic darts they use to knock out Rhino's and lions so that they can be transported easier.
By the time he woke up , he would be back in Ethiopia.
 
Did he really claim that?
how did you miss that, much discussed on the news a few months back

trying to win customers back from Reform with Farage tactics, me thinks

however no smoke without fire, and I felt many of the professional pundits (even on the BBC) were saying that there was some truth behind some of it
 
how did you miss that, much discussed on the news a few months back

trying to win customers back from Reform with Farage tactics, me thinks

however no smoke without fire, and I felt many of the professional pundits (even on the BBC) were saying that there was some truth behind some of it

I was confirming his choice to use the word "convicted", rather than a phrase equivalent to "carried out"
 
That fruit cake that was deported back to Ethiopia apparently kicked off and refused to get on the plane

They had to bung him £500 as an incentive :giggle:

Incentive should be a tazor
Hand cuffs
Ankle cuffs
Straight jacket

And a smack

If he refuses to board the plane
Another point is that the Asylum seeker was deported the day after being recaptured.
It proves that the government could deport these law breakers almost immediately they are caught.
So why aren't they doing it.
 
He'll have a defence counsel because that's the system, however clearcut the evidence is

It's relevant because if he hadn't come here (illegally) and been granted asylum, the victim would still be alive

Which do you object to? That he came here illegally? Or that he was granted asylum?

There are lots of people who would still be alive if we didn't have people. How should we rid ourselves of people, in order to protect people, do you think?
 
Back
Top