"ALL of "THE BEATLES".

Johnmelad502 · 2 May 2010

big-all · 2 May 2010

some years ago i worked out i had 212 ish beatles songs [writen by or performed by]your lost looks simmilar

Johnmelad502 · 2 May 2010

big-all said:
some years ago i worked out i had 212 ish beatles songs [writen by or performed by]your lost looks simmilar

I stole your list while you were having your wicked way the the lady next door.

Deluks · 2 May 2010

erm, thanks for that

...but have you got any links to any decent bands? like the Stones?

Johnmelad502 · 2 May 2010

Deluks said:
erm, thanks for that
...but have you got any links to any decent bands? like the Stones?

Just for you... A link to StoneTube.com http://www.stone-tube.com/

gregers · 2 May 2010

me thinks SOMEONES BORED?

snico · 2 May 2010

'stones' and 'decent band' in the same sentence

Steve69the69Gas · 3 May 2010

Stone Roses better

AndrewSchofield · 4 May 2010

I'm not criticising, because for a Beatles Fan who was born well after the Beatles split up, this is fantastic, but - How long did this take you?

Or have you copied and pasted from somewhere else?

Nige F · 5 May 2010

Dora Bryan " All I want for Christmas is a Beatle" and Lennon`s "#9 Dream" is all the Fab Four I need.

Johnmelad502 · 5 May 2010

AndrewSchofield said:
I'm not criticising, because for a Beatles Fan who was born well after the Beatles split up, this is fantastic, but - How long did this take you? Or have you copied and pasted from somewhere else?

Copied and pasted from an Email. However, some of the links did not work so spent about an hour correcting them. As a 60s teen and beetles fan, well worth the effort.

Rico99 · 6 May 2010

Sorry but the Beatles just dont do it for me.

Can't knock the song writing, but as a band highly OVER RATED.

Rolling Stones much better overall package.

Rico

snico · 6 May 2010

Sorry but the Rolling Stones just dont do it for me.

Can't knock the song writing, but as a band highly OVER RATED.

The Beatles much better overall package

JohnD · 6 May 2010

what's copyright?

Lincsbodger · 6 May 2010

Rico99 said:
Sorry but the Beatles just dont do it for me.

Can't knock the song writing, but as a band highly OVER RATED.

Rolling Stones much better overall package.

Rico

dont you just hate history revisionists...............

The Beatles revolutionised music. They took the rock and roll of the 50's and turned it into the pop of the 60's. The beatles changed everything about music, from the way it was made to the way it was marketed. they invented so many things that changed the music industry, quite frankly its gets tedious to list them, from multitracking to the use of innovative instruments, from the Sitar to the Picollo Trumpet. They saved Classical Music from the hole it had dug itself into by using classic music devices like the Aeolian Cadence and classical instrumentation, and they became the brand leaders of the Swinging Sixties and as such, had vast and profound influence over art, music, fashion, design, culture and society. They profoundly changed the attitude of the western world, and helped transform 50's Rebellion in 60's Protest.

The Beatles were a paradigm shift in culture and a turning point in western cultural history, there influence on popular music was still reverberating in the 1990's. Without the Beatles., and there effect on 60's musical culture, there would not have been Progressive Rock, Glam Rock, Punk, and all the other genres that followed as a result. The Stones , on the other hand, were a band.

"ALL of "THE BEATLES".

Johnmelad502

Johnmelad502

Johnmelad502

Johnmelad502

Lincsbodger

Similar threads