Andrew Bridgen

One point to ponder is the fact that the ferocity of the attempt to discredit him is directly proportional to how much they fear him.
Are you claiming "ferocity" because you don't agree with it and are just groping for a criticism? He's just another silly prat who got squashed by due process.
 
Covid-19 was LEAKED from a lab, says Professor Angus Dalgleish

Covid: Angus Dalgleish discusses the NHS vaccine mandate

So he's claiming knowledge about something the other side of the world. He's a prat then.
And he's not bright enough to realise he'll be seen as a prat.

Will I believe anything else he says? That's not a hard question.


This is the guy who appears to think his voluble claims a couple of years ago , are now wrong.

He stood for UKIP too. Wonder how that's going now.
 
Last edited:
Yawn yawn. Factual references please.
Lol in a thread about Brigend being sidelined you come out with that.
What part of facts only being allowed one way do you not understand.
Got another, lot of sprightly pensioners are turning up at jp surgeries a shadow of themselves with neurological disorders.
You won't hear about that though from JP's knowing they'll be struck off if they don't follow the party line.
 
As he was for vaccinations it's more likely part of a group that wants to end boosters rather than leave the decision to the medics. Perhaps he sees that as where his future is. There has always been back ground rumbles within the party about all aspects of covid handling.

You take the man seriously? ;) There is no accounting for taste.

The current narrative is more interesting. NHS and rail. One problem on the NHS is privatizing overspill and those that could ldischarged. Rail appears to be about inadequate profit levels. The same is cropping up in the general area of public transport by other means.
This will shed a bit more light on the issue of the rail dispute.
 
Lol in a thread about Brigend being sidelined you come out with that.
What part of facts only being allowed one way do you not understand.
He's talking shyte, just like you do, again and again and again and again.

Dead right I come out with that.
Answer it then. No gantshyte.

Don't know what a town in Ayrshire has to do with it.

I can say you are a demented simpleton. You can defend it. I am entitled to my view of what I see as l evidence. Yes?? Or do you ask for evidence?

Your poo is not the other side of the argument. It's just poo. Same old.

Got another, lot of sprightly pensioners are turning up at jp surgeries a shadow of themselves with neurological disorders.
You won't hear about that though from JP's knowing they'll be struck off if they don't follow the party line.
You mean you made up another. Full poo production mode, aren't you.

Pray tell us about these judges' surgeries with the sprightly pensioners.
You need to mould your poo into something better.
 
Last edited:
Got another, lot of sprightly pensioners are turning up at jp surgeries a shadow of themselves with neurological disorders.

Perhaps you could explain how "sprightly pensioners", have "neurological disorders,"
 
This will shed a bit more light on the issue of the rail dispute.
I listened to an enquiry meeting. Unions first where MP's seemed more interested in if strikes put people of using rail followed by the gov end negotiators. LOL The majority of trains can't be driver only as lack cameras to check what passengers are doing and it seems there will be some one else anyway. Profit was mentioned and what sounded like a drop in use due to changes in how people work - working from home etc. Not entirely clear but that is hardly surprising. They need to find £2b savings,

One labour MP asked an interesting question. Say the lowest paid in a sector were offered ~10% and all got the same amount irrespective of what they earn. A solution which for various reasons unions would find harder to refuse.
 
Thought that might bring some colour to your cheeks.
The same mantra keeps coming out 'show us the evidence' what part of censorship doesn't compute?
 
This will shed a bit more light on the issue of the rail dispute.
A bloke shooting himself inthe foot.
He says the concerns aren't about money but safety and the work life balance of his people and their health.
Then he says there can be a negotated settlement - with money.

He accepts the profit of 2% , but that's apparently too much - rants on as though it's all going to a few people.
He sounds like he's a communist who thinks there should be £0 profit. But that can be negotiated away too.

Another twit.
 
Thought that might bring some colour to your cheeks.
The same mantra keeps coming out 'show us the evidence' what part of censorship doesn't compute?
More poo from your mouth, then.
Now you're shaping it into "censorship" - with zero evidence.
The only colour you produce is brown.
 
Lol in a thread about Brigend being sidelined you come out with that.
What part of facts only being allowed one way do you not understand.
Got another, lot of sprightly pensioners are turning up at jp surgeries a shadow of themselves with neurological disorders.
You won't hear about that though from JP's knowing they'll be struck off if they don't follow the party line.
If only he had come up with facts to support his wild claims. Then they would be facts and not wild claims.

all he needs to do to discredit them is facts.

where are these facts? Or should we be just following gut feelings ! If so, why ?
 
Back
Top