Charlie Kirk

You were. Ironic that the topic is having an IQ over 70.

Me - people on TikTok don't have IQs over 70.
You - well Trump is on there and I bet his IQ isn't over 70!

Also you - DUH!
I mean, that's not what he said, but we all misread things occasionally.
 
I mean, that's not what he said, but we all misread things occasionally.
I imagine you don't have to do much reading on TikTok, it's all presented in 10 second videos. Which explains your inability to parse basic English.
 
I imagine you don't have to do much reading on TikTok, it's all presented in 10 second videos. Which explains your inability to parse basic English.
10 minutes. You seem to be quite ignorant of the modern world.

And no, Silvano did not say Trump is on TikTok. The sentence was stating that they believed Trump to be on there and asking for correction.

Tell me more about parsing basic English, since you've failed to do so repeatedly.
 
Nobody cares about that. The point is that the discussion with the 12 year old did not happen. That child did not say the things his mother alleged. A moderate amount of literary experience is sufficient to spot when someone is fabricating a written account. It's very difficult to write fiction well, far more so than most people realise, and I can say without fear of correction that this story is not just fiction, it's fiction written by an unskilled author.

But you're right about one thing. I'm not on TikTok on account of having an IQ over 70.
Since you have no knowledge a priori of the person concerned you just have an opinion which cannot be stated with any certainty.

Your post is philologically redundant.
 
A moderate amount of literary experience is sufficient to spot when someone is fabricating a written account. It's very difficult to write fiction well, far more so than most people realise, and I can say without fear of correction that this story is not just fiction, it's fiction written by an unskilled author.

How hard would it be for a single poster to invent and maintain several different fictitious identities.
 
The point is that the discussion with the 12 year old did not happen.
in your opinion

That child did not say the things his mother alleged
in your opinion

and I can say without fear of correction that this story is not just fiction,
in your opinion

it's fiction written by an unskilled author.
in your opinion


Then the entire narrative was written down in the article cited and claimed as fact
youve just stated a load opinions as fact..............how embarrassing for you :ROFLMAO:
 
Here is a clip showing all the disgusting things that Charlie Kirk said.


Charlie Kirk was a truly hateful awful person, anybody on the right that's upset me saying this needs to watch and see the hate.

Enjoy
 
Here is a clip showing all the disgusting things that Charlie Kirk said.


Charlie Kirk was a truly hateful awful person, anybody on the right that's upset me saying this needs to watch and see the hate.

Enjoy
Only someone who never listened to Charlie Kirk and doesn't have the brainpower to address his arguments and instead would rather skim a compendium of out of context clips would find that useful. Sad.
 
Back
Top