D
dontbelieveawordofit
.
Last edited by a moderator:
D
dontbelieveawordofit
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone still doubt there's something up now? TalkRadio offered a valuable service in questioning and holding to account the politicians and 'experts' running the Covid sht show. They held up the lockdown and draconian rules for examination by people who are eminent in their fields. And the rules and lockdown really didn't bear close scrutiny. Now the sinister mainstream media who are hand in glove with the government have stamped down on anyone who dares to question the status quo.
Johhny doubted me when I said on a previous thread about any Covid lockdown dissent being crushed. This blatant censorship makes him look more naive than usual. Anyone who agrees with the removal of TalkRadio from Youtube is anti free speach. They're all for Stalinist control of us all.
Expect this thread to disappear soon as well.
Johhny doubted me when I said on a previous thread about any Covid lockdown dissent being crushed. This blatant censorship makes him look more naive than usual. Anyone who agrees with the removal of TalkRadio from Youtube is anti free speach. They're all for Stalinist control of us all.
Expect this thread to disappear soon as well.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
So who will you vote for next time round?
So, anyone who thought and disliked that there was a conspiracy theory will now be pleased to learn that it wasn't a theory.
D
dontbelieveawordofit
.
Last edited by a moderator:
D
dontbelieveawordofit
.
Last edited by a moderator:
It's now blatantly obvious. BLM and climate changers can demonstrate and even get away with wrecking the place. Peaceful anti lockdown protest = police brutality. Criticism of lockdown on radio or internet = censorship.
Yes, we now live in a dictatorship. All very sinister and worrying except for the willing sheeple who prefer ignorance.
Yes, we now live in a dictatorship. All very sinister and worrying except for the willing sheeple who prefer ignorance.
Last edited:
The question is more and more becoming "Who have you voted for, next time around?"
Or, to be more accurate, deliberate lies are being suppressed
"Do lockdowns stop Covid, generally?
In his video of 8 September, Mr Cummins also insists that the spring lockdown did not cause the subsequent fall in deaths or severe illness. In a (now deleted) talkRADIO interview on 6 October with Julia Hartley Brewer, who shared his original video, he said: “Since April the data is pretty clear… This is real world empirical data analysed to check the effect of lockdown, and almost without exception, there is no correlation. And this is published in the Lancet, and there’s five published papers now.
“There’s essentially no substantial connection between lockdown and outcomes of ICU and mortality. That’s a reality.”
Later, he said again: “There is no credible publication post-hoc, or after the event during the summer, that has really claimed that lockdowns are in any way effective.”
This is simply untrue. A research paper published in June in Nature, one of the most prestigious scientific journals in the world, concludes: “Our results show that major non-pharmaceutical interventions—and lockdowns in particular—have had a large effect on reducing transmission.”
Another in Science in July said: “Focusing on COVID-19 spread in Germany, we detected change points in the effective growth rate that correlate well with the times of publicly announced interventions.”
https://fullfact.org/health/can-we-believe-lockdown-sceptics/
"Was it herd immunity instead?
Mr Cummins does not deny that Covid-19 exists, or that many people died from the disease in spring. However, he claims that the epidemic began to die out naturally—soon after lockdown, but not because of it—making it appear that the lockdown itself was taking effect.
By way of explanation, Mr Cummins uses a chart showing Covid deaths per day in several European countries, which he claims shows the epidemic growing until it begins to run out of people to infect, then eventually declining to very low levels.
According to him, for a variety of reasons including prior exposure to similar viruses, most people were already immune to Covid when it first emerged, which would be why the epidemic ran out of susceptible people so quickly. In the end, he claims this meant that the pandemic in Europe was effectively over by the summer. Dr Yeadon claims something similar.
One obvious problem with this theory emerged soon after Mr Cummins made the video, when the UK and the other European countries he mentions all saw significant “second waves” of the virus. This means we can be almost certain that these societies were not immune to it.
Mr Cummins and Dr Yeadon both claim that this is a result of many “false positive” Covid tests (where people who test positive don’t actually have the virus) but, as we have said before, false positives are not common enough to explain this.
We can also now see that at the peak of the second wave in the week to 20 November, the total excess deaths in the UK were 21% (2,155) higher than the five year average. Something, in other words, was undoubtedly causing far more deaths than usual, which cannot be explained by faulty tests. This was Covid."
Mr Cummins does not deny that Covid-19 exists, or that many people died from the disease in spring. However, he claims that the epidemic began to die out naturally—soon after lockdown, but not because of it—making it appear that the lockdown itself was taking effect.
By way of explanation, Mr Cummins uses a chart showing Covid deaths per day in several European countries, which he claims shows the epidemic growing until it begins to run out of people to infect, then eventually declining to very low levels.
According to him, for a variety of reasons including prior exposure to similar viruses, most people were already immune to Covid when it first emerged, which would be why the epidemic ran out of susceptible people so quickly. In the end, he claims this meant that the pandemic in Europe was effectively over by the summer. Dr Yeadon claims something similar.
One obvious problem with this theory emerged soon after Mr Cummins made the video, when the UK and the other European countries he mentions all saw significant “second waves” of the virus. This means we can be almost certain that these societies were not immune to it.
Mr Cummins and Dr Yeadon both claim that this is a result of many “false positive” Covid tests (where people who test positive don’t actually have the virus) but, as we have said before, false positives are not common enough to explain this.
We can also now see that at the peak of the second wave in the week to 20 November, the total excess deaths in the UK were 21% (2,155) higher than the five year average. Something, in other words, was undoubtedly causing far more deaths than usual, which cannot be explained by faulty tests. This was Covid."
It's true, there really are people out there who make money out of pushing anti lockdown nonsense.
Who would've thought controversial views on YouTube get better rankings.
Gosh
