There is huge pressure on players to win every time, to match up to the belief that we are a great footballing nation. just as we are a great nation. The reality is different on both counts, especially as every team makes a special effort to beat us. The rise of the super clubs like man Utd means players first loyalty is often to team rather than country. The one truly outstanding player we have in Harry Kane means our success almost always turns on how he is playing.
To win, we either have to plan to score in open play, or win on penalties.
For me and the issue with teams that sit back :
- we don't shoot enough at all
- we don't shoot enough from distance
- we try to walk it in which, given massed defences, is not realistic
While the technical ability argument might hold water when discussing our failure to "walk it in", it doesn't explain our reluctance to shoot.
Of course, when you shoot, you take the chance that you'll not score. Which means handing possession back to your opponent.
My opinion is that we've been so indoctrinated into "if they don't have the ball, they can't score", we avoid any risk whatsoever of handing possession over.
And, as we can't walk it in, we just pass it around thirty yards out. Occasionally forwards, then across and then back to the defence.
Rinse and repeat.
I also think there is a problem with our confidence to let (low block teams who really should not be able to hurt us) have the ball.
Take some risks, take some shots and if they break, be confident that you'll get it back and attack them again.
Every time Ghana broke, we shat ourselves. And we didn't take enough scoring risks to offset that.
Was it then that we were so scared of Ghana 's occasional forays, that we didn't have a pop when we were camped in their final third?