- Joined
- 26 Aug 2016
- Messages
- 6,833
- Reaction score
- 1,010
- Country
Ok, then what?You might want to check that.
Ok, then what?You might want to check that.
I assumed the op was talking about hot water, so that's what I was referring to. But you won't get enough flow through the heat exchanger without the pump running, so that would apply to whether you're demanding HW or Ch.
Fair point, I can't imagine the OP was considering that as an alternative to a Combi though!The OP wasn't talking about Gravity anything with a combi boiler. He was referring to the open vented domestic water.
You can't have gravity circulation on primary pipe work with a modern boiler. But you're allowed gravity secondary water.
Am I ignorant or would you prefer to claim that I was ignorant in order to weaken the validity of my opinion in the eyes of others.Your ignorance of the topic is amusing considering how against the principle you are.
That is a big advantage to a housing association who have to pay to maintain the equipment installled in their properties. It is of little benefit to owner occupiers but then as Intergas state their prime market was ( and maybe still is ) housing associations and owners of rented properties.The mesh network is to allow a single box to be used for 250 appliances. Saving a housing association having the cost and complexity of 250 boxes.
That is a useful function but could be achieved by an external control systemThe unit for regular systems can link 4 (iirc) boilers and is useful when you have multiple boilers in a property.
If as you claim it is obvious to you that the figures are crap then can you enlighten those who cannot see the obvious.As for the bre figures. It should be obvious why they're crap.
Architects and structural engineers have a different opinion.Besides, as I have said before, having worked at their establishment in Watford, I've seen first hand the incompetence of and if the people working there.
Did the test house independently produced the the figure or did they verify results that Intergas claimed. No I haven't asked the test house because I have not been gven the name of the test house.I care little. I don't measure the claim of 122% efficiency. I don't sell that boiler (yet). It is the test house that generates the results, not Intergas. Have you asked the test house?
I will continue to question and seek explanations for claims that are at best dubious. I do not feel in the least self important.Or are you going to keep banging your drum of self-importance?
You can but only if the arrangement of the heat exchanger is such that gravity circulation will commence. The return to the heat exchanger has to be at the bottom of the exchanger and the flow taken from the top of the exchanger.You can't do gravity on a new boiler,
Am I ignorant or would you prefer to claim that I was ignorant in order to weaken the validity of my opinion in the eyes of others
That is a useful function but could be achieved by an external control system
That is a big advantage to a housing association who have to pay to maintain the equipment installled in their properties
It is of little benefit to owner occupiers
If as you claim it is obvious to you that the figures are crap then can you enlighten those who cannot see the obvious.
Did the test house independently produced the the figure or did they verify results that Intergas claimed. No I haven't asked the test house because I have not been gven the name of the test house.
I will continue to question and seek explanations for claims that are at best dubious. I do not feel in the least self important.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local