contrails (chemtrails)

[aveatry]

So on the one hand Air Traffic regulations say that planes following the same track closely should have 300 feet of vertical separation and planes crossing should have a minimum of 1,000 -2,000 feet of vertical separation.

You keep on not reading - they were not on the exact same track.
And remember that your debunking argument is that its the differences in atmospherics that causes it. So you think that the atmospheric conditions are vastly different at 38,000 feet and only 300 feet apart section of the sky.
So on one hand you are trying to say one plane did this and another one didn’t because the atmospheric conditions were different at only 300feet apart and yet these chemtrails go from horizion to horizion and stay airborne for hours on end and slowly spread out and join others until there is a thin white blanket covering the sky. And they never hit a bit of sky that does not have the conditions needed to create them. I think my horizion to horizion is at least about 32 miles of ground track

 

[aveatry]

So how close were these planes flying to each other so you think? At what altitude? You said the same altitude, I'm curious how exact that 'same' is.

Precisely the same or plus/minus 10ft, 100ft, 1000ft, 10,000ft?

The same 33,000 but can not remember the 100s over that for each one - that is according to the app and a few mins apart but slightly different track so basically almost the same patch of sky a few mins apart. Same aircraft - one was horizon to horizon chemtrail and the other - nothing not even a contrail. So the debunking using atmospherics does not work.

 

[IT Minion]

So you think that the atmospheric conditions are vastly different at 38,000 feet and only 300 feet apart section of the sky

The same 33,000

You keep on not reading

The problem is that I am making the mistake of reading what you type. And it's nonsense.

1) if they're on different tracks they weren't separated by 300 feet vertically, they were probably 1,000 feet or more apart

2) there is no way you can judge the difference between 33,000 feet and 32,000 feet from the ground by eye.

3) 300 feet is enough to be in a different layer of air.

4) there is literally nothing that anyone can say to prove to you that you're wrong. Your mind is closed to that possibility. I could be convinced I am wrong if there was a massive announcement by several hundred directly responsible pilots, ground crew, chemical engineers and forensic investigations of the specially adapted planes. Its a tall ask, but on the other hand there is nothing that could convince you is there?

5) you can't even see the difference between 33,000 and 38,000 when it's written down. Let alone when it's moving over your head at 600mph.

 

[aveatry]

The problem is that I am making the mistake of reading what you type. And it's nonsense.

1) if they're on different tracks they weren't separated by 300 feet vertically, they were probably 1,000 feet or more apart

2) there is no way you can judge the difference between 33,000 feet and 32,000 feet from the ground by eye.

I was using the app -- I keep telling you. I mentioned about eyeballing it because its a skill I have learnt whilst using the app - its not difficult to do once you have looked at loads and then checked the app - you get to know but was using the app today because I wanted to make sure they were using the same patch of sky

3) 300 feet is enough to be in a different layer of air.

show me the stats to back that one up then

4) there is literally nothing that anyone can say to prove to you that you're wrong. Your mind is closed to that possibility. I could be convinced I am wrong if there was a massive announcement by several hundred directly responsible pilots, ground crew, chemical engineers and forensic investigations of the specially adapted planes. Its a tall ask, but on the other hand there is nothing that could convince you is there?

You clearly have not read the thread -its all been talked about in here already. There is no need for a massive conspiracy, no need for pilots, ground crew, specially adapted planes if it is in the fuel.

5) you can't even see the difference between 33,000 and 38,000 when it's written down. Let alone when it's moving over your head at 600mph.

From the IT man who has never heard of a flight tracking app.

 

[King Billy]

First one today - being the first chemtrail at 2.30 when 2 mins before - no con or chem same height same plane type.

Same glasses?

 

[King Billy]

same plane type.

Jet engines? Wings and a tail? No reverse gear?

 

[King Billy]

I never said they were on the exact same route so its you looking dum

No dumbo I use flight radar 24 and ADS-B exchange, they are flight trackers. And Actually with a lot of use of the app you can become good a estimateing heights

How high were you at the time?

 

[King Billy]

You are trying so hard to debunk that you are not thinking are you
If as you say changing conditions in seconds due to speed then the atmospheric debunk falls down because the chemtrail is constant. And the planes are not separated by 25 miles either - same altitude same aircraft type a few mins apart slightly different heading. One cons - one chems, proof its not atmospheric conditions.

Did you get a photo?

 

[King Billy]

its a skill I have learnt

[/QUOTE]

Who are "you lot" you prove that you live in a white racist area because you can not understand how anyone can tell the difference - well if you live in these areas then you 100% can. Sikh, Hindu Muslim, and add to that Romanian, Polish, and Somalian and gypsy everyone I know can recognise the differences - its not that big a thing.

Is that the same skill that allows you to determine someone's nationality by sight?