D
Deleted member 307320
I think having been convicted and imprisoned for a sex offence is a pretty clear indication
Does Suella have a point?
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
I think having been convicted and imprisoned for a sex offence is a pretty clear indication
That would be after they have received legal aid. It does not explain how you'd deny those prior to a trial?
Legal Aid that you never applied for?
What was the reason you did not bother applying for legal aid - i.e. what did you need it for? Prey tell.
D
Deleted member 307320
Legal Aid that you never applied for?
What the hell would be the point in applying for something when I clearly wasn't eligible?
D
Deleted member 307320
Did you read the article I posted above? I'm referring to that sort of case, surely that's obvious?
Are we speaking birds here?
You are making no sense....
So you didn't need any aid. Legal or otherwise.
Above?
No I haven't.
D
Deleted member 307320
You are making no sense....
So you didn't need any aid. Legal or otherwise.
Well I clearly did need it, as I was unable to pursue a case of a blatent breach of my rights.
You are not making any sense at all. So you didn't have a case or a court date or a prosecution?
What was your legal gripe? Why were you ineligible?
D
Deleted member 307320
I was held by police and refused access to a solicitor.
Fair is good...
But tell that to the tories who have cut the percentage of those eligible for legal aid from the original 80% of the population when set up to less than 25%...
It has been estimated that it would take just under £1bn a year to put the eligibilty level up to 50%...
Meanwhile...
Linky
Personally I believe that there should be a minimum level of legal aid for everyone, and should anyone wish for more expensive representation then they pay for it themselves...
But of course the tories don't care about justice for anybody except themselves and their rich chums!
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,924
- Reaction score
- 1,502
- Country
I trust you have made an official complaint . The result ?
D
Deleted member 307320
Nothing... It was Police Scotland's policy at the time, even though it was in breach of human rights. Some people successfully sued them, I could not
