Dover...

@Notch7 seems to have ignored this question so I’ll ask it again.

If the EU "control their borders", how are all the refugees getting to Calais?
You spend your time making false arguments to support the Brexit con.

There is a difference between controlling legal borders and controlling people arriving across fields in the dead of night or by boat.
 
I'd call that NOT controlling their borders. Glad that’s cleared up.
Nearly all countries care more about people arriving than leaving. Of course they care more about the potential illegal immigrants from the UK than those leaving to the UK.
 
Just to be precise, May and Boris signed up to BRINO. We, the majority of the public, wanted Brexit.
Just to be precise 36% of the electorate voted to leave the EU...

Not the 'majority of the public' :rolleyes:

But maybe you could tell us exactly the type of 'brexit' you voted for?

Any form of trade deal for you?

Any form of co-operation on UK/EU relationships for you?
 
Isn't it strange that lacking some sort of agrrement as we had with the EU entering or leaving any country involves some checks. All countries have their rules and apply them. The EU doesn't single out the UK for checks it applies the same to all.

Dover like some other factors of the UK has no resilience at all.
 
Just to be precise 36% of the electorate voted to leave the EU...

Not the 'majority of the public' :rolleyes:
And to be even more precise, for the umpteenth time, 51.9% of the electorate that could be bothered to get off their arse or send in a postal vote, voted to leave the EU. If you believe that those that would have voted to stay in the EU but didn’t would have outnumbered them, that just makes the average remainer thick, lazy or both. Which is it?
 
And to be even more precise, for the umpteenth time, 51.9% of the electorate that could be bothered to get off their arse or send in a postal vote, voted to leave the EU. If you believe that those that would have voted to stay in the EU but didn’t would have outnumbered them, that just makes the average remainer thick, lazy or both. Which is it?
I don't think anybody doubts that the brexit vote won. But claiming the vast majority of people voted for a different choice of brexit to what we have is, at best surprising and at worst, misleading or downright totally incorrect. Which do you think it is ?
But the pertinent questions really are
Is brexit working well.
And
What are the actual tangible benefits of brexit.
Probably pointless asking you again as you couldn't answer that before.
 
And to be even more precise, for the umpteenth time, 51.9% of the electorate that could be bothered to get off their arse or send in a postal vote, voted to leave the EU. If you believe that those that would have voted to stay in the EU but didn’t would have outnumbered them, that just makes the average remainer thick, lazy or both. Which is it?

It matters not how many times you explain it to them they still don’t quite understand

Sort of brain fade syndrome unable to grasp reality :ROFLMAO:
 
Referendums blimey

Any referendum has to ask a simple question on the ballot paper that can be answered with a yes or no

Imho there should never have been a referendum in the first place in this caper

But since there was

I got off my arris and voted for the first time since the 80s :cool:

If there had been a second referendum called on the caper I would not have bothered
 
Would you care to explain that to JBR please.
He appears to think there were different choices of brexit available.
Poor fellow apparantly voted for something he didn't want
Yes, exactly. I voted for independence from the EU.
No, no half-measures keeping us in any way under any control by Brussels. No other choices.
I know exactly what I voted for.
What I, nor anyone else, knew was that powers in Westminster had no intention of honouring that vote in full.
 
Back
Top