That's obviously a crucial part of the 'assessement of the individual situation'as well as consideration of the way the kitchen would or could be used ...However, it would depend on an on-site assessment of the individual situation.
I'm not too sure which "books of rule(s)" have much specific or explicit to say about this issue....and a sensible interpretation of the book(s) of rules.
That's one of the many issues which would be consdiered but, off the top of my head, I doubt I would consider that as materially different from the situation in which the taps/worktops were not connected (and none of it earthed).... maybe the taps linked by copper pipe connect the work tops but then the supply to the kitchen is in plastic pipe. ( hence the water pipes are bonding the work tops together but not earthing them ).
... that's another consideration to go into the 'risk assessment melting pot'. I'm not too worried about that possibility of 'tingles' (which would very probably not happen), but the presence of earthed taps in the proximity of the extensive (unearthed) metal of the worktops would certainly be a major factor which would go into my melting pot.What if the taps are bonded via pipe work to the MET and not in contact with the work tops. Potential difference between taps and un-bonded / earthed work top could be enough to tingle due to a class two appliance capacitively coupling 115 volts to the work top.
More for the melting pot! I'm not sure that I'd get too excited about this one - we are discussing/debating two possible approaches (neither of which is outrageous/unacceptable) and, if the decision were to not earth the worktops, all that would happen in your scenario is that one would temporarily switch to the other approach.And placing an earthed metal appliance on one work top would "earth" that work top but only when the appliance was plugged in to a socket.
You haven't said so yet, but do I take it that you would probably favour earthing the worktops, in almost any situation?
Kind Regards, John