14 IS mentioned here in maxwell conviction .I haven't heard about Epstein abusing children. Just girls (and maybe boys) under the legal age of consent, but sexually mature.

14 IS mentioned here in maxwell conviction .I haven't heard about Epstein abusing children. Just girls (and maybe boys) under the legal age of consent, but sexually mature.
That's what I'm saying. Girls of 14 have been sexually mature for anything up to 4 years. I'd be surprised if Maxwell and Epstein would be interested in the odd one who wasn't.14 IS mentioned here in maxwell conviction .
That's what I'm saying. Girls of 14 have been sexually mature for anything up to 4 years. I'd be surprised if Maxwell and Epstein would be interested in the odd one who wasn't.
What are you on about? Sexually mature girls are not children. It's an offence to have sex with them even if consensual (depending on the jurisdiction) but it's not paedophilia.And what makes you think that
And have you not heard about the 12 year old french triplets
What are you on about? Sexually mature girls are not children. It's an offence to have sex with them even if consensual (depending on the jurisdiction) but it's not paedophilia.
I think he’s attempting to stick up for Trump and Epstein.OK, I see what you mean, now. You are looking at the medical definition of paedophilia.
But what you have said above is wrong. Somebody under the age of 18 is still a child.
you certainly sound quite a sick individual and trying to justify it by saying nothing wrong with having sex with a possible 10 year oldWhat are you on about? Sexually mature girls are not children. It's an offence to have sex with them even if consensual (depending on the jurisdiction) but it's not paedophilia.
Eh? What the actual @*ck?I haven't heard about Epstein abusing children. Just girls (and maybe boys) under the legal age of consent, but sexually mature.
That's correctI've lost track of the point you are making. You originally replied to my post and stated that these girls weren't children. Is that still your contention.
Nonsense. The age of (sexual) consent is 16 in UK, for a start.Somebody under the age of 18 is still a child.

The legal definition of a child is anyone under 18.Nonsense. The age of (sexual) consent is 16 in UK, for a start.
Aren't we getting a little shrill here? I didn't say it's OK to have sex with anybody under the age of consent, and it's illegal in civilsed countries (though not in some Muslim ones, I understand).you certainly sound quite a sick individual and trying to justify it by saying nothing wrong with having sex with a possible 10 year old
Except in matters of sexThe legal definition of a child is anyone under 18.

No, in all matters. If you are under 18 you are a child.Except in matters of sex
Deluded MAGA ignores the fact Trump has been s reaming at the FBI to take his name of the Epstein files1. Not dead
2.bidens boy will get shafted his crack fueled interviews will sink him
3. As an ex president he was entitled to have secret documents unlike Biden who had them laying about in unlocked garage and gave them to ghost writer. Bolton also had no right to keep any