Epstein case

[gas112]

what notch agrees with someone who says its ok to have sex with a ten year old if she is sexually mature whatever the fek he means by that .
And you think its wrong to pull him up

 

[Odds]

The original comment was:

Girls of 14 have been sexually mature for anything up to 4 years. I'd be surprised if Maxwell and Epstein would be interested in the odd one who wasn't.

That may be true, statistically, but i'm not going to argue the point because words will be twisted.

 

[gas112]

The original comment was:

Girls of 14 have been sexually mature for anything up to 4 years. I'd be surprised if Maxwell and Epstein would be interested in the odd one who wasn't.

That may be true, statistically, but i'm not going to argue the point because words will be twisted.

yeah and he thinks its ok to shag sexually mature girls which in his eyes could be ten year olds

 

[Odds]

Don't watch the film Lolita in that case.

 

[denso13]

yeah and he thinks its ok to shag sexually mature girls which in his eyes could be ten year olds

No he doesn't, he was querying the paedophilia link to Epstein, which is factually incorrect.

People can have a grown up conversation about things you know.

 

[denso13]

I liked his post because of the factual description of paedophile


Some girls are sexually active from around 14 / 15 - if it’s with boys of similar age, it may not be wise but it’s not paedophilia

If older men are having sex with a girl under 18, it’s not paedophilia but it’s grooming and disgusting and wrong.


Gas112 doesn’t seem capable of grown up debate based on facts.

@Lirefighter thinks sex trafficked/groomed children are prostitutes. Weirdo.

 

[Notch7]

Factual my ar5e he was talking about from the age of ten you sick pervert

which part of this post (which I liked) indicates a “sick pervert”

I suggest you apologise and retract immediately

Aren't we getting a little shrill here? I didn't say it's OK to have sex with anybody under the age of consent, and it's illegal in civilsed countries (though not in some Muslim ones, I understand).
I'm just objecting to the media (in this case and others) using the word paedophile for dramatic effect, when children aren't involved.
Also the girls in the Epstein case must take a share of the blame. Did they think they were being invited for their sparkling company?

 

[Notch7]

Sick pervert notch agrees that shagging ten year old is ok and its there own fault you need some serious help

Please retract this lie with immediate effect.

 

[Notch7]

yeah and he thinks its ok to shag sexually mature girls which in his eyes could be ten year olds

Where did he say it is ok?

 

[Notch7]

Please retract this lie with immediate effect.

I see gas112 has run away to hide

Coward

 

[MNW67]

why would i apologise to you , you need therapy and help from a professional

I think this is down to how the Reaction system works on here. It is difficult to know what to do if you Like one part of a post but not another part.

It is clear that @Notch7 was simply thanking FixitFlav for explaining the technical legal meaning of paedophilia in those two posts. It was probably an unwise thing to do, bearing in mind the sensitivity of the topic!

 

[gas112]

I think this is down to how the Reaction system works on here. It is difficult to know what to do if you Like one part of a post but not another part.

It is clear that @Notch7 was simply thanking FixitFlav for explaining the technical legal meaning of paedophilia in those two posts. It was probably an unwise thing to do, bearing in mind the sensitivity of the topic!

nothing clear about it at all and i am shocked that on this site more have not called out the original poster who thinks that shagging a sexually mature ten year old whatever the fek that means is not paedophilia and in the epstein scenario they must have known what they were going for .
Doesnt get any sicker

 

[MNW67]

nothing clear about it at all and i am shocked that on this site more have not called out the original poster who thinks that shagging a sexually mature ten year old whatever the fek that means is not paedophilia and in the epstein scenario they must have known what they were going for .
Doesnt get any sicker

I agree that is was all extremely weird, to say the least. I did question him a few times to try to find out what he was getting at.

 

[fixitflav]

No he doesn't, he was querying the paedophilia link to Epstein, which is factually incorrect.

Not quite sure what you mean. I hold my hands up about the legal definition of a child (your #42). I can see that it justifies the term paedophile even when pre-pubertal children are not involved, making it sound more serious. But when you say "the paedophilia link to Epstein, which is factually incorrect" do you mean he is not a paedophile by my earlier definition? Just curious.
Is there a legal term for a pre-pubertal child, do you know? Infant?

People can have a grown up conversation about things you know.

Agreed, gas112's accusations are too ridiculous to comment on.

 

[fixitflav]

It is clear that @Notch7 was simply thanking FixitFlav for explaining the technical legal meaning of paedophilia in those two posts.

It seems I was wrong about the technical meaning, but I still think that's the common sense meaning