FGM

Joined
20 Nov 2009
Messages
42,464
Reaction score
6,482
Location
Surrey
Country
United Kingdom
6590 woman and girls had a procedure to treat fgm between April 2019 and March 2020

Of these 205 were born in the UK
 
I know a lot about FGM.

My wife had to do a course a few weeks back, I did it too to help her do the test.

Teachers have a mandatory reporting duty if they suspect a child may have been subjected to FGM.

Egypt is the country with the highest number in the world 87%

There are 4 types of FGM

I could go on and on.......
 
A comparison of FGM in a man would be chopping off the whole head of the penis.

4E754B80-58E2-43F4-A9AB-079083BFACB5.gif
 
It's not a pi55ing contest, it's still mutilation of a boy who is given no choice in the matter.
Yep, babies being mutilated with no choice is disgusting. If anyone wishes to be circumcised it should be a choice as an adult.
But.. most boys don't end up with lifelong pain.
There can be health benefits of circumcision, as well as a procedure that can be still carried out in the UK if there is a medical reason for it.

FGM has no health benefits afaik.
It leaves girls/women with lifelong pain
It's not available on the NHS, in fact, it's banned in the UK.

So, it's not really a peeing competition I agree! They're not really the same imo.
 
Yep, babies being mutilated with no choice is disgusting. If anyone wishes to be circumcised it should be a choice as an adult.
But.. most boys don't end up with lifelong pain.
There can be health benefits of circumcision, as well as a procedure that can be still carried out in the UK if there is a medical reason for it.

FGM has no health benefits afaik.
It leaves girls/women with lifelong pain
It's not available on the NHS, in fact, it's banned in the UK.

So, it's not really a peeing competition I agree! They're not really the same imo.

I know they're not the same and FGM is far more gruesome with lifetime negative effects.

Yes, sometimes it is medically necessary to circumcise a male.

No I don't believe there are proven health benefits to being circumcised, the only research I found supporting it was funded by a certain group.
 
I know they're not the same and FGM is far more gruesome with lifetime negative effects.

Yes, sometimes it is medically necessary to circumcise a male.

No I don't believe there are proven health benefits to being circumcised, the only research I found supporting it was funded by a certain group.
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-men/
What group was that? If it's any religious group, then I think it should be banned for religious reasons.
I just looked at the NHS for health benefits.
 
I suppose my point would be that the disgusting practise of FGM is rightly illegal in the UK, but I strongly believe circumcision for non medical reasons should also be illegal, unless it is an adult individuals choice.
 
Since data started being collected 5 years ago
24420 woman and girls have been identified as having been subjected to the practice

145 (?) procedures have been carried out in the UK ( illegally)
 
Since data started being collected 5 years ago
24420 woman and girls have been identified as having been subjected to the practice

145 (?) procedures have been carried out in the UK ( illegally)
I think there was a prosecution in the UK, first of it's kind? Remember reading about it some while ago. Changing the law will help those kids in the UK eventually..
 
Back
Top