Fixing TT earthing problems and gas bonding for an EV charger

[StuB]

Here's a better photo of the gas bonding I've found.

Hopefully that's acceptable for Octopus.

 

[EFLImpudence]

These companies cannot make up their own wiring regulations.

 

[endecotp]

Bonding conductors shall not be looped between services unless installed as a single continuous conductor.

Here's a better photo of the gas bonding I've found.

Hopefully that's acceptable for Octopus.

Well apparently not....

(This is something that interests me because I also have incoming gas and water that are near each other but remote from the CU. Do we know where this "continuous conductor" idea comes from?)

 

[EFLImpudence]

You can always connect the gas with the continuous conductor and loop to the water.

 

[JohnW2]

(This is something that interests me because I also have incoming gas and water that are near each other but remote from the CU. Do we know where this "continuous conductor" idea comes from?)

People have been talking about that alleged requirement for as long as I can remember, but I don't know where it came from.

I thought that it had probably been made up by some old version of the OSG, but I can't find it in either my 17th ed. copy nor the current one, and it's certainly not in BS7671 (and I don't think ever has been). Is the infamous NICEIC (in one of its guises) perhaps responsible for having invented this one?

In any event, as EFLI has pointed out, if you're really concerned you could have a 'continuous conductor' connecting two or more remote extraneous-c-ps to the MET.

 

[StuB]

You can always connect the gas with the continuous conductor and loop to the water.

People have been talking about that alleged requirement for as long as I can remember, but I don't know where it came from.

I thought that it had probably been made up by some old version of the OSG, but I can't find it in either my 17th ed. copy nor the current one, and it's certainly not in BS7671 (and I don't think ever has been). Is the infamous NICEIC (in one of its guises) perhaps responsible for having invented this one?

In any event, as EFLI has pointed out, if you're really concerned you could have a 'continuous conductor' connecting two or more remote extraneous-c-ps to the MET.

Thanks for the replies again, they're much appreciated.

Am I correct in thinking that you are both suggesting using the same wire and looping through the gas earth point to the water one using a single cable to fulfil their single continuous conductor?

If so I may have a problem doing that as in the last photo I posted the cable on the left comes from the CU and the one of the right goes to the water.

I can't tell if there are two wires going into that ring connector or just one that is looped and if I had to cut it at the ring connector to do it again the cable would be no longer be long enough to reach the water pipes or certainly not right by the stop tap anyway.

The water pipe does run in the wall near to where the gas pipe earthing currently is so it may be possible to cut a hole in the plasterboard to expose the water pipe and move the water earthing point so the single existing cable is used.

It seems a silly thing to do as it would be in a less accessible position and would be a bit of a sod to do although it would be still be within 600mm of where it enters the property.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Am I correct in thinking that you are both suggesting using the same wire and looping through the gas earth point to the water one using a single cable to fulfil their single continuous conductor?

No.

If you are wrongly told that it is not allowed to bond the gas pipe with anything other than a continuous wire, then bond the gas with the continuous wire and then connect another from gas to water.

If so I may have a problem doing that as in the last photo I posted the cable on the left comes from the CU and the one of the right goes to the water.

So the gas is already bonded with a continuous wire.

 

[endecotp]

If you are wrongly told that it is not allowed to bond the gas pipe with anything other than a continuous wire, then bond the gas with the continuous wire and then connect another from gas to water.

But he has been told that "Bonding conductors shall not be looped between services unless installed as a single continuous conductor"; it's not specific about gas.

 

[denso13]

Looking at the photos of our supply pipe they look to be yellow plastic so hopefully that covers it anyway

Yes, as Octopus have confirmed, bonding not required.

 

[EFLImpudence]

But he has been told that "Bonding conductors shall not be looped between services unless installed as a single continuous conductor"; it's not specific about gas.

They are even wronger than I thought, then.

Those regulations obviously do not mention looping nor single conductor.

As I mentioned earlier, it is allowed to actually use the water pipe as a main bonding conductor.
How they think that could be achieved as a single conductor I have no idea.

These companies cannot make up their own wiring regulations.

 

[JohnW2]

Am I correct in thinking that you are both suggesting using the same wire and looping through the gas earth point to the water one using a single cable to fulfil their single continuous conductor?

I certainly was - and that is something that is often done (not the least because it is 'sensible').

However, EFLI has interpreted (I suspect incorrectly) what has been suggested - namely that he seems to think that it is being said that the bond to the gas pipe must be 'continuous' but the bond to the water pipe does not need to be - and so has made a different suggestion. Nevertheless, if one does as you and I have suggested, then that satisfied the perceived 'requirement', no matter how it is worded/interpreted.

However, as has been said, no-one is aware of any actual regulatory requirement for anything to be 'continuous', so I really don't think you should worry whether it is continuous or not. Let's face it, even if a bonding conductor is 'continuous' from the pipe to the CU (main Earthing Terminal) then there will still be several 'joins' in the path between the path and 'anything that matters' (touchable metal parts of parts of the electrical installation.

 

[EFLImpudence]

namely that he seems to think that it is being said that the bond to the gas pipe must be 'continuous' but the bond to the water pipe does not need to be - and so has made a different suggestion.

That is correct.

I can only remember the continuous myth relating to the gas as it is somehow more important - or maybe water companies know there is no such rule.

Nevertheless, if one does as you and I have suggested, then that satisfied the perceived 'requirement', no matter how it is worded/interpreted.

Yes but I had assumed that neither the existing gas nor water bond was long enough to do that.

 

[JohnW2]

That is correct. I can only remember the continuous myth relating to the gas as it is somehow more important - or maybe water companies know there is no such rule.

Oh, I thought the myth applied to both.

Yes but I had assumed that neither the existing gas nor water bond was long enough to do that.

That may, of course, be true. I was really talking, in general, about ways in which the myth could be satisfied, rather than specifically about the OP's (or endecotp's) situation.