Flag dynamics

[pete01]

Not like you. You claimed you'd won the wager, then you later let slip that Tom was banned and didn't leave on his own accord.
The bet was that he left on his own accord.
Have you paid him yet?

You're surely not going to renege on paying your debts after the hoo-ha you made when you thought you'd won.

I did win, why you bovered?

 

[Knave of Hearts]

I did win, why you bovered?

Like I've said several times, you initially implicated me, accusing me of defaulting on the wager.
Your insincere apology does not remove those accusations. And you apologies do not appear to be genuine.
Like I've said many times, each time you raise the issue, you automatically involve me time and time again.

It's time you paid Tom what you owe him, if you have any honour left in you.

 

[pete01]

Like I've said several times, you initially implicated me, accusing me of defaulting on the wager.
Your insincere apology does not remove those accusations. And you apologies do not appear to be genuine.
Like I've said many times, each time you raise the issue, you automatically involve me time and time again.

It's time you paid Tom what you owe him, if you have any honour left in you.

I didnt mention you for god sake.....if I owed Tom I would pay him as it turned out he flounced off so he owes me.....if I said banned I didnt mean banned....got it now....pppffttttt

 

[Knave of Hearts]

I didnt mention you for god sake.....

You and others insinuated that I was Tom.

...if I owed Tom I would pay him as it turned out he flounced off so he owes me.....

You later let it slip that he had been banned. So you lost the bet.

if I said banned I didnt mean banned.......

Oh, so you think it's OK to not pay, based on your tortuous, confused wording of the wager?
Just pay up!

 

[pete01]

Just pay up!

Who should I pay as you arent Tom apparently, and Tom has left the site.....

On him being banned who knows as far a I know he deleted his own account but as im not him I dont really know for sure, however you somehow seem to know he got banned....wonder how you know that

Anyway I'll say no more as I got blocked from the last thread that you made a big deal about a bet I had with Tom (not you)

 

[fixitflav]

Is skin colour actually important ?

Surely it's the person (people) that matter

Of course, but what has that to do with my comment on morqthana's post?

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Who should I pay as you arent Tom apparently, and Tom has left the site.....

Precisely, so why the histrionics about Tom owing you money, if he is a non-entity.
You might as well report Father Christmas to the police for some imaginable crime.
Now do you understand the stupidity of your and others claim?

On him being banned who knows as far a I know he deleted his own account but as im not him I dont really know for sure, however you somehow seem to know he got banned....wonder how you know that

It was you that said he had been banned. I have no information about whether he left or was banned.
You were claiming that you had won, because he had left, which was the condition on which you would have won.
Then you let it slip that he had been banned, which meant you had lost.
Who knows why and how he left, not you certainly, you've just said so.
Yet you were claiming you had won, which was unverifiable.
Therefore yours, and others assertions that you had won the wager was based on assumption, not fact.
It seems the only thing that is owed is a sincere apology from you, Highway Man and fillystine to Tom, for your and their unwarranted allegations.

Anyway I'll say no more

Based on your previous assertions that you will not mention it again......... until the next time.

as I got blocked from the last thread that you made a big deal about a bet I had with Tom (not you)

I suspect you were blocked for your attempted scamming.

 

[pete01]

Precisely, so why the histrionics about Tom owing you money, if he is a non-entity.
You might as well report Father Christmas to the police for some imaginable crime.
Now do you understand the stupidity of your and others claim?


It was you that said he had been banned. I have no information about whether he left or was banned.
You were claiming that you had won, because he had left, which was the condition on which you would have won.
Then you let it slip that he had been banned, which meant you had lost.
Who knows why and how he left, not you certainly, you've just said so.
Yet you were claiming you had won, which was unverifiable.
Therefore yours, and others assertions that you had won the wager was based on assumption, not fact.
It seems the only thing that is owed is a sincere apology from you, Highway Man and fillystine to Tom, for your and their unwarranted allegations.


Based on your previous assertions that you will not mention it again......... until the next time.


I suspect you were blocked for your attempted scamming.

Whatever bet me and Tom had What on earth has it got to do with you?

Unless of course.....no I wont say it...

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Whatever bet me and Tom had What on earth has it got to do with you?

Unless of course.....no I wont say it...

As I've said repeatedly, it's because you alleged that I was Tom, and despite your insincere apologies, you continue to insinuate that I am Tom.

You have apologised several times, for that false allegation, and you say you won't mention it again.
Yet here we are again. you've mentioned it, and are again insinuating that I am Tom.

That illustrates your insincerity and lack character.

In addition, you've admitted you don't know if Tom left or was banned, so the base for your claim of winning the wager is also false.

It suggests to me that you are a thoroughly insincere and untrustworthy kind of person, who makes a wager (we don't know if it was agreed by Tom) and later lay claim to winning the bet on your unsubstantiated claims.
There are some vulgar words to describe your behaviour. Scamming is more polite and comes close to describing your behaviour.

 

[pete01]

As I've said repeatedly, it's because you alleged that I was Tom, and despite your insincere apologies, you continue to insinuate that I am Tom.

You have apologised several times, for that false allegation, and you say you won't mention it again.
Yet here we are again. you've mentioned it, and are again insinuating that I am Tom.

That illustrates your insincerity and lack character.

In addition, you've admitted you don't know if Tom left or was banned, so the base for your claim of winning the wager is also false.

It suggests to me that you are a thoroughly insincere and untrustworthy kind of person, who makes a wager (we don't know if it was agreed by Tom) and later lay claim to winning the bet on your unsubstantiated claims.
There are some vulgar words to describe your behaviour. Scamming is more polite and comes close to your behaviour.

Im saying no more to you on the subject......victory dance....

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Im saying no more to you on the subject......victory dance....


View attachment 395635

Until the next time.


Don't fret the loo will be free in a minute, just try and hold it.

 

[pete01]

Until the next time.

To you I said, if it gets mentioned some other time don't poke your nose in

 

[Knave of Hearts]

To you I said, if it gets mentioned some other time don't poke your nose in

While your and others allegations and insinuations remain and are repeated, I'll feel free to jump in, as and when I ilke.

 

[pete01]

While your and others allegations and insinuations remain and are repeated, I'll feel free to jump in, as and when I ilke.

Well don't cry about it then as it has nowt to do with you....does it?

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Well don't cry about it then as it has nowt to do with you....does it?

Until the next time that you and others insinuate it does.