Following on from difficulties last November (now sorted), we've had some additions with further detectors and another extension rio.
The panel is, I think, a GD-48 - could be a 3-48.
Main panel plus, now, two extension RIOs remote from the panel. Two keypads, two usable entry/exits.
Yesterday, I set about trying to walk-test the system as the place is all but shut down.
However I've failed to do so.
Using '-31 all zones' on the original provided keypad (I can't any results from keypad2 - probably off an extension) I can get a good response off the early few PIRs on RIO 0 but nothing off 1011-1014 and nothing from the first extension rio 1021-1028 (yet I know 1028 works as it's a door and I entered that way). Also, nothing from a new RIO extension they've provided and the 5x PIRs cabled to it.
So is there a per zone setting that has been programmed to inhibit walk-testing or a firmware bug or does the operator need substitution ??
Any thoughts welcome. If it is the later, please advise what the substitute needs to be aware of.
The panel is, I think, a GD-48 - could be a 3-48.
Main panel plus, now, two extension RIOs remote from the panel. Two keypads, two usable entry/exits.
Yesterday, I set about trying to walk-test the system as the place is all but shut down.
However I've failed to do so.
Using '-31 all zones' on the original provided keypad (I can't any results from keypad2 - probably off an extension) I can get a good response off the early few PIRs on RIO 0 but nothing off 1011-1014 and nothing from the first extension rio 1021-1028 (yet I know 1028 works as it's a door and I entered that way). Also, nothing from a new RIO extension they've provided and the 5x PIRs cabled to it.
So is there a per zone setting that has been programmed to inhibit walk-testing or a firmware bug or does the operator need substitution ??
Any thoughts welcome. If it is the later, please advise what the substitute needs to be aware of.
