No, she used the courts to encourage Parliamentary Democracy.
Do you think you know a better way?
george soros funding anti-brexit campaign
- Thread starter HawkEye244
- Start date
No, she used the courts to encourage Parliamentary Democracy.
Do you think you know a better way?
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2016
- Messages
- 5,885
- Reaction score
- 1,085
- Country
She asked the court to rule on what is legal.
I'd have thought that any politician overruling parliament would be cause for concern
I'd have thought that any politician overruling parliament would be cause for concern
Evidently you don't believe in Parliamentary Democracy or the Supremacy of Parliament.
Perhaps you should study the British Constitution.
The UK is a parlamentary democracy so it is only fit and proper that any decision is taken by them ? They could have voted the caper down , they had a majority in principle to do it , but they chose not to
the fact that the woman tried to hinder ? or stall ? or stop the referendum ? result is neither here nor there imho at least she was open and above board with it
As opposed to certain other politicians / organisations
the fact that the woman tried to hinder ? or stall ? or stop the referendum ? result is neither here nor there imho at least she was open and above board with it
As opposed to certain other politicians / organisations
Sponsored Links
D
Doggit
No, that's why I can't stand the women. She used the excuse that parliament should have the right to vote on it, not to uphold democracy, but as a way of trying to derail the Brexit process. She's hoping that people like Anna Soubry and Kier Starman will put a spoke in the process. Now that is unquestionable democracy in action, but she might not have got the courts to force the issue if she's said what her true intentions were.
The odd thing about this situation, is that although the voting public decreed that Brexit should go ahead, the excuse of upholding democracy, could well reverse the true democratic decision of the populace.
The odd thing about this situation, is that although the voting public decreed that Brexit should go ahead, the excuse of upholding democracy, could well reverse the true democratic decision of the populace.
If the populace decide they want to change their minds, or realise they were misled, would you try to stop them?
V
vinty
How many referendums do you want.
D
Doggit
Only as many as it takes to get the result he want; Johns not fussy. He only want a democracy that works for him, not against him.
Two, surely? Even idiots get reality - eventually.
D
Doggit
Not with the way some of you remoaners carry on.
more than 40 years anti-EU moaning from your lot, and not stopped yet.
Doggit's not fussy. He only want a democracy that works for him, not against him.
that's why he doesn't want our courts to uphold our constitution; he doesn't want our Parliament to do its job, and he doesn't want our citizens to vote.
that's why he doesn't want our courts to uphold our constitution; he doesn't want our Parliament to do its job, and he doesn't want our citizens to vote.
D
Doggit
Blah Blah Blah, same old same old same old. Twist everything, and deny everything because you've got got nothing sensible to say
D
Doggit
Uh Uh, just nothing you want to hear.
Sponsored Links
