Great speech. She is the antithesis to grifter Fromage. No wonder they got soundly trounced.I cannot disagree with anything she says:
Great speech. She is the antithesis to grifter Fromage. No wonder they got soundly trounced.I cannot disagree with anything she says:

And they have a willing partner to form a government. As long as Labour are replaced by a government that is ready to undo their mess, it will be worth sticking around.That’s my point, re form are short if the majority they need regardless of how the Greens split the Labour vote.
Like the idea of shipping prisoners abroad and those falling for it.bonkers.
It’s not legal. That simple.
I’ve seen with my own eyes people helping the voter, how else can they vote? A ballot is never secret because the ballot paper and counterfoil have matching numbers.Only 1 person is allowed into the booth, end of, and the staff will always enforce this rule, despite the abuse they will often receive.
I’ve seen with my own eyes people helping the voter, how else can they vote? A ballot is never secret because the ballot paper and counterfoil have matching numbers.
Exactly, the wording isn’t absolute. The law clearly needs to be changed to say anyone who votes in a way that pusses off Farrage is guilty of an offence . Kind of like what is happening right now in that bastion of democracy Trumpfland.It is fine in the circumstances blup outlined:
'(1) A person who—
(a) is with another person at a polling booth, and
(b) intends to influence that other person to vote in a particular way or to refrain from voting,
commits an offence.'
Great speech. She is the antithesis to grifter Fromage. No wonder they got soundly trounced.
No more bonkers than Re form or the state of British politics. It’s anyone’s guess who will win the next election but the Greens have shown they are an antidote to Re forms poison.And they have a willing partner to form a government. As long as Labour are replaced by a government that is ready to undo their mess, it will be worth sticking around.
The green manifesto is bonkers.
What, they can’t read/write 'X' against a name they can recognise on the voting slip you mean, or does the 'helper' explain the policies of each candidate to the person to enable them to make up their own mind? Pull the other one!It’s not collusion, it’s an English speaking family member- often male - helping a non speaking usually elderly female relative.
Any different from someone saying I'm voting for 'X' because that's the way my family have always voted?What, they can’t read/write 'X' against a name they can recognise on the voting slip you mean, or does the 'helper' explain the policies of each candidate to the person to enable them to make up their own mind? Pull the other one!
There isn’t another one to pull.What, they can’t read/write 'X' against a name they can recognise on the voting slip you mean, or does the 'helper' explain the policies of each candidate to the person to enable them to make up their own mind? Pull the other one!
