- Joined
- 6 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 3,612
- Reaction score
- 1,079
- Country

So, I warranted the reasoning for isolators.
I also warranted the reason why there are no regulations concerning isolators.
And that, I think, was a perfectly valid reason to warrant.
Then Taylortwocities comes along and asks if it’s acceptable to earth things that don’t normally get earthed, asks if I’m not doing it anymore, and claims it was supposedly a regulation before, when it actually never was. Even if it had been, what justification would there have been for it?
And what justification is actually more justifiable?
Earthing unnecessary stuff, window sills, whatever…
Or having an isolator protecting an oven, hob, cooker, or even a fridge, washing machine, microwave, whatever may be.
I’m pretty sure most people would go for the latter. But why was it omitted, and why does Taylortwocities compare a reasonable, justifiable solution like having an isolator to a “regulation” that never even existed, of earthing window sills and random metal bits?
Does this mean Taylortwocities thinks both are equally justifiable to leave out of the regs? Both equally dangerous? Both equally acceptable? And yet, not having them in the regulations is supposedly fine? Or does he think they’re the same in nature?
I also warranted the reason why there are no regulations concerning isolators.
And that, I think, was a perfectly valid reason to warrant.
Then Taylortwocities comes along and asks if it’s acceptable to earth things that don’t normally get earthed, asks if I’m not doing it anymore, and claims it was supposedly a regulation before, when it actually never was. Even if it had been, what justification would there have been for it?
And what justification is actually more justifiable?
Earlier editions of the regs required any metal item (eg metal window frames, bannister rails, etc) to be earthed.
I guess you aren’t doing that any more?
Earthing unnecessary stuff, window sills, whatever…
Or having an isolator protecting an oven, hob, cooker, or even a fridge, washing machine, microwave, whatever may be.
I’m pretty sure most people would go for the latter. But why was it omitted, and why does Taylortwocities compare a reasonable, justifiable solution like having an isolator to a “regulation” that never even existed, of earthing window sills and random metal bits?
Does this mean Taylortwocities thinks both are equally justifiable to leave out of the regs? Both equally dangerous? Both equally acceptable? And yet, not having them in the regulations is supposedly fine? Or does he think they’re the same in nature?
