How to use 'deadly force - and get away with it.

Not being funny but I am not seeing anything shocking here? These people are playing games and the ICE agents are not. This man was fighting and resisting, I really do not understand how anyone could be so shocked. Shooting someone dead is not nice but they have a job to do and if you get in their way then this is how they react. Just leave them alone and nobody gets hurt.

He had done nothing illegal. Do you believe in the rule of law where you can only be arrested for doing something which is actually illegal. They attacked him because he tried to assist a woman who had been bundled over to get back to her feet. Then he was pepper sprayed, held down and beaten by five men. Finally, one of them shoots him dead.
 
He had done nothing illegal. Do you believe in the rule of law where you can only be arrested for doing something which is actually illegal. They attacked him because he tried to assist a woman who had been bundled over to get back to her feet. Then he was pepper sprayed, held down and beaten by five men. Finally, one of them shoots him dead.
Then stop fighting with them and getting in their way, it is quite simple really. They had no option but to do this to try and calm him down. He didn't calm down and so he became a threat. Personally I believe a single shot to his leg would have been more apt rather than killing him but you do not know if he was drawing a gun to warrant this.
 
Last edited:
It's implying that it did happen. Changing the intent of the sentence from a question to a request for a summary of a known event.

That will make the LLM reply with an answer that agrees with the question. Even if you just add a 'was there a' at the beginning it changes the response perceptibly.

Thanks, but I didn't ask AI a question and didn't intend to. I already knew that Blair's population replacement is happening and I wanted to see if it was written about on AI, and surprisingly it was. It is a known event! Are you saying that AI is wrong?

Similarly, if I want to read an AI search on Bob Dylan, I would simply type 'Bob Dylan', rather than 'Is there a Bob Dylan' , because I already know he exists.
 
Thanks, but I didn't ask AI a question and didn't intend to. I already knew that Blair's population replacement is happening and I wanted to see if it was written about on AI, and surprisingly it was. It is a known event! Are you saying that AI is wrong?

Similarly, if I want to read an AI search on Bob Dylan, I would simply type 'Bob Dylan', rather than 'Is there a Bob Dylan' , because I already know he exists.
Yes, because your statement implies intent. Also 'replacement' is a loaded term, these days it's almost always a call out to the far right Great replacement theory and their anti semitism.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top