- Joined
- 30 May 2024
- Messages
- 3,695
- Reaction score
- 1,482
- Country

I only asked a question.Have you read that? Whatever it is it's not a systematic review. A systematic review finds all the relevant papers, screens then for quality and compares outcomes, both positive and negative.
That just lists everything that hydrogen rich water has ever been tested for and lists it as a benefit or a potential lead without any scrutiny or attempt to compare across papers, which is the entire point.
If that's the best there is then it's absolute junk. That makes Andrew Wakefield look like a medical professional.
Talk about mountains