IKEA

Not legally though. My early view that it would be redundancy was before I read the legislation. People do things every day that result in them getting sacked. drugs, drink driving, smoking inside etc. theft etc.. laziness, external personal pressures etc. they don't lose benefits as a result.

Out of date here but at one point if people walked away from a job it interfered with state support. A while ago I have heard of people asking to be sacked and getting a good reference from their employer.

I assume redundancy still needs notification as companies would rather not give any.

12 just men might decide that enforcing vaccination is wrong. The rest of the legal system that is available ?????????????????? It could get very long winded. Some of the legal end of things will see it as an opportunity to make money some may think it's wrong.

Unfair dismissal may raise it's head at some point.Maybe constructive in this case. Many employers feel they can do what they like with contracts of employment. With good reason in a lot of cases as well.

The missing thing really is what sector of the NHS has to have them. Some already have to accept jabs as a condition of employment. There are valid reasons and the same applies to covid.

The other aspect if people bother to look at info that is available is vaccines decreasing symptomatic infections = more time working. Omicron may have messed that up but for many it's still there and is being maintained. I think this aspect will spread to more areas of employment over time. It's a no brainer as far as an employer is concerned. All that can be argued against it is that the data available is wrong. Saying one virus has less effect doesn't really matter as no one can forecast what it might do in the future. Not just here but more or less anywhere.
 
Back
Top