I've been waiting for this.The day i enjoy a moment of cricket or golf is the day i give myself both barrels omfg.
The throw might have been but the ball didn't cross the boundary until a long time after the two runs were made.The throw was way before they crossed for the second run, but did the 'act' happen when it hit Stoke's bat?
Well if I turned up wearing completely out of place clothing demanding the rules be changed to my rules as I found them offensive demanding free entrance, then turning up every week with new 'family members' and threatening legal action if you didn't let me in what would you do then.I've been waiting for this.
So - you don't feel the need to integrate into the culture of England. Perhaps you should be asked or made to leave.
Irrelevant...The throw might have been but the ball didn't cross the boundary until a long time after the two runs were made.
Had the ball not crossed the boundary it would have been just the two runs (unless they ran more while the ball was being retrieved).
Hardly.Irrelevant...
I don't see how you can argue for 5.By the rules of the game it looks like it should have been 5,
Not up to him. He just motioned an apology for the fluke, like they do.Stokes appeared to motion that it shouldn't count which given the situation was a great act of sportmanship...
Nevertheless they still checked the replays.As was the instant reaction of the NZ captain to call a six for England when the NZ 'catcher' put his foot on the boundary rope.
Yes.All that pressure to win, but the game was played in a great spirit!
Irrelevant...
By the rules of the game it looks like it should have been 5, and the 'super over' would never have happened...
Stokes appeared to motion that it shouldn't count which given the situation was a great act of sportmanship...
As was the instant reaction of the NZ captain to call a six for England when the NZ 'catcher' put his foot on the boundary rope.
All that pressure to win, but the game was played in a great spirit!
You obviously haven't read rule 19.8I don't see how you can argue for 5.
Maybe 4 - as in when a boundary is hit, any runs made do not count - just the four - but that must be the rules or someone would have said.
Read Rule 19.8No, the over throws are in addition to any runs the batters complete.
What are you talking about? Dunno about Festive but I support West Ham and the team is like the United Nations!I don't think the English Cricket Team is English enough for MOT and Festive.
They not only had crossed for the second run, they were both home in their respective creases.Read Rule 19.8
It is not the runs that the batters complete, it is "the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act."
No, they had completed TWO.They completed one run, but the ball was thrown before they had crossed a second time (the run in progress)...
What are you talking about? Dunno about Festive but I support West Ham and the team is like the United Nations!