The usual apologists, correct.Ok. There are people on this thread trying to claim it was an accident though
The usual apologists, correct.Ok. There are people on this thread trying to claim it was an accident though

read the sky news article. Looks more like some idiot thinks he can follow the parade in his car, ends up reversing into someone, gets attack and then goes mad.The usual apologists, correct.
I get that you are angry the world knows he was white, I've seen the article and it explains why the police released the information.read the sky news article. Looks more like some idiot thinks he can follow the parade in his car, ends up reversing into someone, gets attack and then goes mad.
Far from it. Reckless - in both cases - but not apparently intentional. That’s why motorbiking - the forum legal expert - said attempted murder was unlikely to stick. The bloke appears to have responded to what he perceived as an attack on his vehicle by the crowd. A fight or flight situation. Many tradies would slap someone if they touched their van. In this case I suspect fight turned to flight fuelled by drink or drugs. Not attempted murder.A stupid and ridiculous thing to say. Morron !!

I get that you are angry the world knows he was white, I've seen the article and it explains why the police released the information.
Just accept it boyo and move on. You don't need to cover for him.

I reckon that is the version that will emerge.Far from it. Reckless - in both cases - but not apparently intentional. That’s why motorbiking - the forum legal expert - said attempted murder was unlikely to stick. The bloke appears to have responded to what he perceived as an attack on his vehicle by the crowd. A fight or flight situation. Many tradies would slap someone if they touched their van. In this case I suspect fight turned to flight fuelled by drink or drugs. Not attempted murder.

You seem glad hes white...It's because he's white and they can't bear that fact.

They addressed this clearly - it was because of far right groups claiming on social media that it was a Muslim terror attack to incite attacks on Muslims, that they felt they needed to point out that it wasn't.A terrible tragedy and I hope everyone survives without any life changing injuries. Apparently the driver was a 53 year old white British man. I do wonder though, that if it had been a 20 year old immigrant or Muslim driving the car, whether the authorities would be as quick to let everyone know their age, colour and nationality.
I'm glad he's under arrest.You seem glad hes white...
You're a strange fella...
There’s a moral case for holding someone responsible for the direct consequences of their actions when drunk or under the influence of drugs. But the penalties for causing serious injury by reckless driving are very high - 14 yearsI reckon that is the version that will emerge.
Dangerous driving, driving while under the influence, maybe some offences against the person. etc.
Like I said, what happens the next time something like this happens and they don’t/wont immediately let everyone know the colour/ethnicity of the perpetrator? They've set a dangerous precedent.They addressed this clearly - it was because of far right groups claiming on social media that it was a Muslim terror attack to incite attacks on Muslims, that they felt they needed to point out that it wasn't.
Who claimed it was an accident?Ok. There are people on this thread trying to claim it was an accident though, I'm not. Let's see what happens without deciding it beforehand.
Left wing loons are everywhere now.You're a strange fella...

There’s a moral case for holding someone responsible for the direct consequences of their actions when drunk or under the influence of drugs. But the penalties for causing serious injury by reckless driving are very high - 14 years

Nosenout could have an argument with a bag of cement. my guess is he's not getting much.You seem glad hes white...
You're a strange fella...