- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,949
- Reaction score
- 3,095
- Country
No, concentrate. You posted this, https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1435, as proof of lies. Where is the lies?
Lots wearing masks this week again.
- Thread starter Harry Bloomfield
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,949
- Reaction score
- 3,095
- Country
Why? What makes you think that?
denso by name, dense by nature...
Care to explain why lies were told in the purchase of unusable PPE weren't lies?
And who benefited?
Are the BMJ wrong?
And this is just the tip of the 'virus' iceberg...
"A total of £4.5bn of financial aid packages was claimed in error or fraud, according to the National Audit Office."
We know of some who boasted of this!
Up to £6k per person was spent on the 'virus', and yet it is now appearing that excess deaths of other preventable diseases/illnesses are increasing because of diverted/invented money...
Care to call these lies?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,949
- Reaction score
- 3,095
- Country
So you still can't give an example of lies told. That's ok, just be honest about it...
The local health authority now classifies Covid as just another seasonal respiratory illness.
Maybe that is what Covid has been all along, i had it a couple of years ago, it was a bit rough but not that much different from the flu.
Another thing i have noticed is that most people who are catching Covid have been double and in some cases triple vaccinated, this make me wonder about the efficacy of these vaccines.
Just another scam perhaps.
Maybe that is what Covid has been all along, i had it a couple of years ago, it was a bit rough but not that much different from the flu.
Another thing i have noticed is that most people who are catching Covid have been double and in some cases triple vaccinated, this make me wonder about the efficacy of these vaccines.
Just another scam perhaps.
So who is denying that?
It's becoming monotonous, but let's try again shall we...
"Define exactly an 'anti vaxxer'...
Is it someone who refuses all vaccine jabs for all illnesses/diseases?
Or is it someone who doesn't wish at a particular point in time not to have a particular jab or jabs?"
No doubt this will give denso a chance to post yet another clueless post, but why won't you answer this?
Sshh...
JohnD and denso will have a joint hissy fit...
And no doubt notchy will want in!
The fact you omitted, was that the chances of dying from covid without having the jab, were much greater.
It's simple matter of odds and statistics, take the infinitesimal risk of accepting the jab, or accept the much greater risk of catching, becoming seriously ill, or dying as a result of covid. Most people with common sense, understand these odds - facts it seems, escape the antivaxxers.
The reason I mentioned his age (under 40) was for a reason that seems to have been lost on you Harry. Meds turned up yet?
You are being totally ridiculous, but really - what else can we expect from you?
First point is I am not in the slightest worried about the price of gas, or energy - I have absolutely no concerns about funding, I am rolling in it. I do have a slight interest in conservation, and avoiding waste and a natural curiosity about many things. The reason 'I am rolling in it', is that I try to avoid waste and I am rather effective at it.
Statistics prove the efficacy of having the jab, as well as proving the risk of not having it. Your sample of one, as a survivor who refused the jab, counts for nothing at all. My own sample of one as a survivor who accepted the jab, equally counts for nothing.
- Joined
- 7 Sep 2022
- Messages
- 4,437
- Reaction score
- 1,269
- Country
Or statistical/reporting manipulation?
Last time I took an interest, you were 20 times more likely to die as a result of catching covid, if you had refused the jab.
That's because they are lacking in a cohesive argument, to explain their terror and fear of a simple vaccination. They are mostly immature children.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
