Mind blown !

[denso13]

You are still managing to pick the wrong examples to make your point. You use gravity as a for certain thing as a point to saying its "still called a theory"
And yet it is now being shown to be wrong

New theory suggests gravity is not a fundamental force - Advanced Science News

A new theory proposes gravity isn’t a fundamental force but emerges from quantum electromagnetic interactions, potentially reshaping our view of spacetime itself.

www.advancedsciencenews.com

Yes, science is always trying to prove itself wrong, that's how it works.

 

[denso13]

And yet it is now being shown to be wrong

No it isn't.

 

[aveatry]

Scientists still refer to gravity as a theory. It is very rare for actual scientists to give certainties as they've been trained to always try to pick holes in their results.

Sadly this means that people who haven't had any scientific training misunderstand them.

So you say "It is very rare for actual scientists to give certainties as they've been trained to always try to pick holes in their results."
You say this as a defence to my picking out the caveats in that climate statement - but most climate nonsense uses words like
"The climate crisis is unequivocally caused by human activities and is unequivocally affecting every corner of the planet's land, air and sea already."

 

[aveatry]

Yes, science is always trying to prove itself wrong, that's how it works.

Don't seem to work that way when it comes to climate science - anything that goes against the climate world boiling naritive is labelled "conspiracy"

 

[aveatry]

No it isn't.

 

[denso13]

Don't seem to work that way when it comes to climate science - anything that goes against the climate world boiling naritive is labelled "conspiracy"

In your mind that is. Nobody else's.

 

[denso13]

View attachment 388016

Are you really claiming that Newton and Einstein's theory of gravity has been proven wrong?

 

[aveatry]

Are you really claiming that Newton and Einstein's theory of gravity has been proven wrong?

why dont you go and read the link

 

[denso13]

why dont you go and read the link

I did when you posted it, "new theory suggests". Scientific rigour means it will be looked carefully, peer reviewed and conclusions made.

If the consensus is that they are on to something then great.

Nothing has been proven yet.

 

[aveatry]

I did when you posted it, "new theory suggests". Scientific rigour means it will be looked carefully, peer reviewed and conclusions made.
If the consensus is that they are on to something then great.
Nothing has been proven yet.

Correct - so why are you getting your panties in a bunch

 

[IT Minion]

So you say "It is very rare for actual scientists to give certainties as they've been trained to always try to pick holes in their results."
You say this as a defence to my picking out the caveats in that climate statement - but most climate nonsense uses words like
"The climate crisis is unequivocally caused by human activities and is unequivocally affecting every corner of the planet's land, air and sea already."

It is very rare.

Since they are sure you should take it much more seriously

 

[denso13]

You are still managing to pick the wrong examples to make your point. You use gravity as a for certain thing as a point to saying its "still called a theory"
And yet it is now being shown to be wrong

New theory suggests gravity is not a fundamental force - Advanced Science News

A new theory proposes gravity isn’t a fundamental force but emerges from quantum electromagnetic interactions, potentially reshaping our view of spacetime itself.

www.advancedsciencenews.com

Why not post something similar from scientific journals showing research in to why our understanding of climate change is wrong (or whatever you think the scam is, is wrong).

Scientists would be famous for showing we are getting it wrong.

 

[denso13]

BEING shown - as in a process - as in not yet and in future event. Maybe I should of added "could" to accommodate the literal like yourself---
Autistic individuals are commonly said – and also consider themselves – to be excessively literalist, in the sense that they tend to prefer literal interpretations of words and utterances. This literalist bias seems to be fairly specific to autism.
Hope that you can get the help you need

Ad hom noted.

 

[aveatry]

Ad hom noted.

You either are on some sort of spectrum or you deliberately grab the wrong end of the stick or deliberately pretend not to understand or purposely use semantics to argue 100 pages over a word.

 

[IT Minion]

You either are on some sort of spectrum or you deliberately grab the wrong end of the stick or deliberately pretend not to understand or purposely use semantics to argue 100 pages over a word.

If you're sloppy with language you get things wrong.

Like your assertion that the temperature hasn't risen since 1884.

Or that June 2022 was the hottest June for the UK. Which incidentally contradicted your earlier nonsense.