mug shot

There's plenty to see.

She should have been told 'NO!'

And people wonder why we're considered a soft touch. Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
But the police offered both mugshots to the media and left it to them to decide….so she hardly got her way.

The article in the Daily Lie, literally has a pic of her full face


This country has millions of people who work full time but can barely afford to live…….but the Daily Lie pushes out endless trivial phoney culture war bolox to excite the easily led
 
But the police offered both mugshots to the media and left it to them to decide….so she hardly got her way.

The article in the Daily Lie, literally has a pic of her full face


This country has millions of people who work full time but can barely afford to live…….but the Daily Lie pushes out endless trivial phoney culture war bolox to excite the easily led
Of those, if they cut their cloth accordingly, I assert the millions would drop in number significantly.
 
But the police offered both mugshots to the media and left it to them to decide….so she hardly got her way.

The article in the Daily Lie, literally has a pic of her full face


This country has millions of people who work full time but can barely afford to live…….but the Daily Lie pushes out endless trivial phoney culture war bolox to excite the easily led
Because the judge rejected the request.

Why do you think this convict is entitled to special treatment, all be it briefly?
 
The purpose of the mug shot is to have a record of the person's face (the mug) to enable them to be identified.

Also, it seems the reason the mugshots sometimes get released after conviction, as in this case, is to do with the public having confidence in the criminal justice system. This is what the Met says:

Where appropriate and where there is a legitimate policing purpose, forces can proactively release information about court outcomes as a way of improving public confidence in the criminal justice system.

Specifically in respect of images, the police, as the legal copyright owner, are responsible for releasing an offender’s custody photograph. The image may be released upon a guilty verdict unless there is a court order or legitimate policing purpose preventing their identification. Images may be released as soon as possible after the verdict to allow the media to publish them contemporaneously, i.e., in their next available edition or broadcast.
The image can be released again upon sentence if necessary.

 
But the police offered both mugshots to the media and left it to them to decide….so she hardly got her way.

The article in the Daily Lie, literally has a pic of her full face
There are two pictures of her, with one showing her full mug and the police and the press have copies of both and both have been published and are in the public domain?

What is the gripe here exactly?
 

Convicted terrorist wants her mug shot, to hide her identity. Police agree despite the law not requiring them to do so.

what is the point of releasing this mug shot.

95224947-14398893-image-a-18_1739555801215.jpg

Maybe she's just covering her 'tache. :idea:
 
Back
Top