Hi all,
I've got a slight situation here.
A loop lighting system - going to the upstairs light circuit, has the ground floor hall lights on it.
The first light only has 1 core (r,b & e) - the second one has 4. I am assuming that the first light takes a feed directly from the second (it also shares the same switch).
In re-wiring in a new pendant for each of them - I have now caused a number of knock on faults.. Yeay!
I identified the switched live, another set of cables set off the conntectivity tester (and don't switch with the switch). At the moment I have set it up with the
Switched live + other red cable from the "always on" into the first two boxes, then the three red loops followed by the rest of the neutrals into the last connectors.
This now means lights further on in the circuit require the 4 core light to be onto turn on themselves... Do I leave the always on red cable with it's mates in the loop connectors and just have the neutral in with the pendant neutral?
Cheers
I've got a slight situation here.
A loop lighting system - going to the upstairs light circuit, has the ground floor hall lights on it.
The first light only has 1 core (r,b & e) - the second one has 4. I am assuming that the first light takes a feed directly from the second (it also shares the same switch).
In re-wiring in a new pendant for each of them - I have now caused a number of knock on faults.. Yeay!
I identified the switched live, another set of cables set off the conntectivity tester (and don't switch with the switch). At the moment I have set it up with the
Switched live + other red cable from the "always on" into the first two boxes, then the three red loops followed by the rest of the neutrals into the last connectors.
This now means lights further on in the circuit require the 4 core light to be onto turn on themselves... Do I leave the always on red cable with it's mates in the loop connectors and just have the neutral in with the pendant neutral?
Cheers