- Joined
- 2 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 6,652
- Reaction score
- 290
- Country
I don't see why the discussion cannot continue in this thread. The reason the original discussion was locked, as far as I can ascertain, is because ninebob tried to use this site to start a petition/lobby. I understand that that might not be written down in the rules as a prohibited act etc but lets leave that to one side until the MODs gain clarification from Admin.
Anyway, I've just read the original thread. I can understand ninebob's concerns but I have to say I agree with Tim. I would add that as well as protecting the hearing of people within the pub, club etc I assume (and that's all it is, an assumption, I have no knowledge of these devices), this device would alleviate possible 'nuisance noise' to residential buildings in the surrounding area of the 'entertainment establishments'. I understand that an entertainment licence must be sought and such circumstances would be considered by the magistrates but such a device may prove useful to the licensee in his/her application i.e. They can prove that the Db level would be at a regulated level.
On the whole I think I agree with it but I'd be interested to hear/read conflicting views.
Anyway, I've just read the original thread. I can understand ninebob's concerns but I have to say I agree with Tim. I would add that as well as protecting the hearing of people within the pub, club etc I assume (and that's all it is, an assumption, I have no knowledge of these devices), this device would alleviate possible 'nuisance noise' to residential buildings in the surrounding area of the 'entertainment establishments'. I understand that an entertainment licence must be sought and such circumstances would be considered by the magistrates but such a device may prove useful to the licensee in his/her application i.e. They can prove that the Db level would be at a regulated level.
On the whole I think I agree with it but I'd be interested to hear/read conflicting views.