Nitpicking

[EdwardCurrent]

Shouldn't it be, You would ??!.

 

[crockett]

Mmmmm, bit of banter, eh?

Some people just require straight answers, not conundrums with a pinch of sarcasm. Some banter is funny, yes, and it's good to have a heated debate, but other banter is just plain asinine, and argumentative for its own sake

 

[tim west]

no it's not!

 

[gremlin16]

Oh yes it is

 

[tim west]

nitpicker!

 

[Shutpa]

Sorry to nit-pick, but I think you're nit-picking and reading too deep into the posts

Sorry to nitpick, but their is no hyphen in nitpick......

How right you are. However, Woody was quite correct to choose the alternative spelling of 'nit-picking' Otherwise, he wouldn't have used it. Woody?

 

[^woody^]

Be careful not to go OT and into the realms of pendantry ... which will require a separate thread

 

[Trazor]

which will require a separate thread

Now you're splitting hairs........

 

[noseall]

which will require a separate thread

Now you're splitting hairs........

we need the king of pedantry.




SOFTUS, WHERE ARE YOU?

 

[^woody^]

Oh no, you've done it now

Quick everyone .... scarper

 

[crockett]

lol

 

[Shutpa]

Shouldn't it be, You would ??!.

No it should not! And while I am on the subject, what the hell is it got to do with you anyway? There is too much nit-picking on this forum already without prats like you making a vain attempt to worsen the situ.

In my opinion, the person who initiated this thread did so because the the tolerance and understanding that one expects in a forum such as this has disappeared only to be replaced by reluctant and bad-tempered advice. Why cant all of you out there be as nice and understanding as I am?

 

[EdwardCurrent]

Shouldn't it be 'situation', rather than 'situ' ?

Ed

 

[tim west]

Shouldn't it be 'situation', rather than 'situ' ?

Ed

I told you already