• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Peter Mandleson

Trump is irrelevant to this thread
No, he is the very reason that Mandelson was even considered for his role.

You have to look at a whole picture, not just the bit that catches your eye.

Throw Mandelson into prison if he has committed any prisonable offences, he is not, and should not be, above the law. But neither should anybody ELSE, involved in the same murky events.

I do NOT support Mandelson, but I do want to see the full picture.
 
Trump is irrelevant to this thread
Nonsense. We are talking about the ambassador to Trumps US. Who happens to be a sex pest, rapist and was best mates with Epstein.
There is a hell of a lot in common there with those two. That's without the glaring hypocrisy from the Trump hornsmokers on here.
 
If Bloomburg can get hold of Mandy’s old emails why couldn’t the government with all its forensic resources. Appointing him to the post before taking expert advice (deep vetting) is a bit like paying Council tax before taking expert advice. On paper at least Kieth is toast.
 
Looks like the officials had the emails before Pmq’s but Starmy didn’t see them until after. So someone was protecting him whilst knowing the PM was going to mislead the house
 
Nonsense. We are talking about the ambassador to Trumps US. Who happens to be a sex pest, rapist and was best mates with Epstein.
There is a hell of a lot in common there with those two. That's without the glaring hypocrisy from the Trump hornsmokers on here.

Nonsense again.

I started this thread about Mandleson - not Starmer or Trump.

You have twisted this to suit your own views.

So it looks like Mandleson deceived the UK security services and / or the UK prime minister

The important part is that Ambassadors are vetted by the UK security services to the very highest levels.

The truth has yet to be revealed
 
What i dont get is I know starmer should have looked into him.....but all these journalists jumping on the bandwagon, how come they didn't bring it up about sooner about Mandleson?
 
What i dont get is I know starmer should have looked into him.....but all these journalists jumping on the bandwagon, how come they didn't bring it up about sooner about Mandleson?
Self - interest, rather than benefit of the country.
For them to sell a story, there has to be a story in the first place.
 
Trump is desperate for all this stuff about Epstein to go away.

And he's done a U turn on making more information public.

Why is that, I wonder?
 
Trump is desperate for all this stuff about Epstein to go away.

And he's done a U turn on making more information public.

Why is that, I wonder?
Throwing other people under the bus to move the attention away.

And it works, as always. Look at them on here, not wanting to know who else is involved, as long as somebody from labour is.

No supporter of mandelson, happy to see him locked up if he deserves to be. But the others should be equally named shamed and treated too.
 
Back
Top