The sums can be done, chaps.
Saying something like
"That's why I checked with Grohe that our gravity fed HW system would be OK with these taps and they said yes. "
Says nothing. WHat one person calls Ok and what another thinks is not,
can be totally different.
Grohe and Hansgrohe "technical" are thick as...
Point of reference -
1)a standard bath tap with the cistern on the floor in the loft, (3m head?), and 22mm pipe, and 3/4" taps, supplied me 22 litres/minute.
2) A 22mm copper pipe has something about 6 times less resistance than 15mm copper.
( It goes with diameter to the power 2.5)
3) a shower fed by 2 x 15mm pipes, something like 6m long, THROUGH A LOW RESISTANCE MIXER ( Mira thermostatic) gives a shower 10 litre/minute. I know cos my old man put that in his house and I measured it.
more...
A big bathful is 100 liters, so at 12 litres a minute hot, plus the cold, that's 5 minutes to fill a bath. Not too bad.
My bath has a pump on it. It fills at 40+ litres/minute. It's fed by 15mm plastic pipe, bore about 12mm. But I'm a plumber so I have to have a F O pump. (4.5 bar). The shower gives the needles I wanted to hurt me. If you want fast needles, you need pressure at the shower head, and lots of resistance at the shower head, with small holes.
Pipe's like a resistor, except that it's a non-linear one. Similar for taps etc.
(( they have Cv values)). If you measure a certain flow, and you have a certain length of pipe, you can work out the pressure drop across it, then (try to ) work out what the flow would be if the pipe were so big it was no significant resistance.
There's loads of pipe-resistance charts online - try the Copper Development association (CDA) site.
They do vary, but are consistent within themselves...
( some charts give double the drop others do, but in the end they're all close enough)
So - does the 15mm pipe matter?
Imagine you have 10 units of resistance. If the pipe is only one of them, then it's not making a significant difference. (ie less than 10%)
Pipe chart I have here shows that at 0.2 litres/second, (near your 12l/min)
head loss in metres per metre run is
0.035 for 22mm
0.22 for 15mm.
I think I read you have 2.5m of 15mm in dispute.
so you'd get a drop in the 15mm of
2.5 x 0.22 = 0.55m
and 22mm:
2.5 x 0.035 = 0.0875m
That's some difference , you'd win 46cm head.
Your head is 2m, so your flow would go up to by a factor of about
246/200, something like 23%
Maybe 20%, maybe 30% ( I said the charts were flaky) but it's not enough to be too significant.
Pipes have scale inside, bends etc which make them worse than theoretical, but even so, most of your resistance is elsewhere.
There are figures for everything, even the hole in the side of the tank has a resistance. If it didn't, you'd have infinite flow with almost no head.
So most of the resistance is in the taps/valves/mixers.
Look at it another way: all the hot and all the cold has to go through the same shower hose, in most houses, which is often 10mm or so diameter, 1.2 or 1.5 metres long. Far bigger effect than two parallel lengths of 15mm!
FLow loss through 10mm pipe, 20l/min, is huge, near 1m head loss per 1m run!
Just for the exercise 2m head, 0.2 litres /sec (=12 l/min) means that you have effectively,
2/0.22 = 9meters of 15mm in there. Or
2/0.035 = 57 metres of 22mm!
My old bath (22 l/min gravity, 22mm pipe, 3, head) had 8m of pipe.
The chart says it would have been 30m of pipe - so there's LOTS of losses in the fittings.
When I was doing domestic shower stuff, I used 22mm plastic - big slow bends, big enough diameter, quick, usually accessible...
Edit 1)_ I checked the CDA chart - page 21
It makes the resistances higher than the IOP, so you'd see more of a difference increasing the pipe size. Still not going to gush, exactly.
Edit 2) I misread your flow rate - now changed to 12 l/min.
Saying something like
"That's why I checked with Grohe that our gravity fed HW system would be OK with these taps and they said yes. "
Says nothing. WHat one person calls Ok and what another thinks is not,
can be totally different.
Grohe and Hansgrohe "technical" are thick as...
Point of reference -
1)a standard bath tap with the cistern on the floor in the loft, (3m head?), and 22mm pipe, and 3/4" taps, supplied me 22 litres/minute.
2) A 22mm copper pipe has something about 6 times less resistance than 15mm copper.
( It goes with diameter to the power 2.5)
3) a shower fed by 2 x 15mm pipes, something like 6m long, THROUGH A LOW RESISTANCE MIXER ( Mira thermostatic) gives a shower 10 litre/minute. I know cos my old man put that in his house and I measured it.
more...
A big bathful is 100 liters, so at 12 litres a minute hot, plus the cold, that's 5 minutes to fill a bath. Not too bad.
My bath has a pump on it. It fills at 40+ litres/minute. It's fed by 15mm plastic pipe, bore about 12mm. But I'm a plumber so I have to have a F O pump. (4.5 bar). The shower gives the needles I wanted to hurt me. If you want fast needles, you need pressure at the shower head, and lots of resistance at the shower head, with small holes.
Pipe's like a resistor, except that it's a non-linear one. Similar for taps etc.
(( they have Cv values)). If you measure a certain flow, and you have a certain length of pipe, you can work out the pressure drop across it, then (try to ) work out what the flow would be if the pipe were so big it was no significant resistance.
There's loads of pipe-resistance charts online - try the Copper Development association (CDA) site.
They do vary, but are consistent within themselves...
( some charts give double the drop others do, but in the end they're all close enough)
So - does the 15mm pipe matter?
Imagine you have 10 units of resistance. If the pipe is only one of them, then it's not making a significant difference. (ie less than 10%)
Pipe chart I have here shows that at 0.2 litres/second, (near your 12l/min)
head loss in metres per metre run is
0.035 for 22mm
0.22 for 15mm.
I think I read you have 2.5m of 15mm in dispute.
so you'd get a drop in the 15mm of
2.5 x 0.22 = 0.55m
and 22mm:
2.5 x 0.035 = 0.0875m
That's some difference , you'd win 46cm head.
Your head is 2m, so your flow would go up to by a factor of about
246/200, something like 23%
Maybe 20%, maybe 30% ( I said the charts were flaky) but it's not enough to be too significant.
Pipes have scale inside, bends etc which make them worse than theoretical, but even so, most of your resistance is elsewhere.
There are figures for everything, even the hole in the side of the tank has a resistance. If it didn't, you'd have infinite flow with almost no head.
So most of the resistance is in the taps/valves/mixers.
Look at it another way: all the hot and all the cold has to go through the same shower hose, in most houses, which is often 10mm or so diameter, 1.2 or 1.5 metres long. Far bigger effect than two parallel lengths of 15mm!
FLow loss through 10mm pipe, 20l/min, is huge, near 1m head loss per 1m run!
Just for the exercise 2m head, 0.2 litres /sec (=12 l/min) means that you have effectively,
2/0.22 = 9meters of 15mm in there. Or
2/0.035 = 57 metres of 22mm!
My old bath (22 l/min gravity, 22mm pipe, 3, head) had 8m of pipe.
The chart says it would have been 30m of pipe - so there's LOTS of losses in the fittings.
When I was doing domestic shower stuff, I used 22mm plastic - big slow bends, big enough diameter, quick, usually accessible...
Edit 1)_ I checked the CDA chart - page 21
It makes the resistances higher than the IOP, so you'd see more of a difference increasing the pipe size. Still not going to gush, exactly.
Edit 2) I misread your flow rate - now changed to 12 l/min.