Oilman, you are a difficult character. One moment you're wasting your breath on chat forums, the next you deliver a devastatingly insightful view of the topsy-turvy world of state regulation. In the past year or two you have spent a fair amount of time roasting me for bucking the system, then you pour scorn on that same system.
For what it's worth, I think the problem runs much deeper than Corgi or non-Corgi, Oftec or non-Oftec. Take two good friends of mine:
One has specialised in industrial refrigeration for over 30 years. He has designed, built and commissioned systems for multi-million pound businesses whose life quite literally depends on them. He claims - and I believe him - that he's never had a failure except when the customer has driven down the price so far that he's had to specify against his better judgement.
He understands the physics of refrigeration, the formulae, the good and bad practices, the tricks and the dodges, as well as anyone alive. He can listen to the heartbeat of a giant plant and tell instinctively what is wrong with it. He is honest as the day is long.
His business is a small one; as such he does not have time to go on courses and sit exams. So as far as J Prescott is concerned, he is a maverick and should not be allowed to trade. Most of his recent work is probably illegal. He could, in theory, be banged up.
When you see the work of some "qualified" people, is this right?
The other guy has a degree in electrical engineering from long ago and has decided to get his hands dirty again after spending most of his career in marketing. He's back to being a student, is currently taking exams, and is appalled by the mindlessness of the tick-box questions which, he says, do not require any depth of understanding.
He was also horrified by the exam conditions - the computer on which he was supposed to tick his boxes was so slow that he spent more time wrestling with the keyboard than thinking about the questions.
These two benefit from a natural curiosity that comes from an education - one formal, the other from the real world - which encouraged them to think, to probe and to question. People like this are becoming hard to find in today's world of tick-boxes. If they haven't been "trained" in some "skill" they don't want to know about it, even less find out for themselves. But they're pretty damn smart at filling in timesheets.
The education system is to cock, which is why I guess some of us are increasingly suspicious of the whole "qualifications" business. People are not encouraged to think any more, merely to absorb oven-ready truisms and then answer multiple choice questions that a group of chimps could get right on a good day.
Prescott may be trying to encourage higher standards in the building industry by demanding that everyone who wields a screwdriver should be "qualified" - a worthy enough objective - but he and his cronies are failing to address the more basic question of why he thinks the entire population, other than those who have passed a stage-managed exam, are incapable of wiring a plug.