Indeed - and I don't think it's difficult to see which of those approaches would be the cheaper over a number of years - given that, even ignoring the (probably high) cost of the repairs, one could probably replace the cheapo one half a dozen times for the same total cost of the just the initial outlay on the Mira one.Two choices.
Cheapo affairs such as Triton for well under £100. When it breaks or inevitably is stuffed with limescale, buy a new one.
Mira ATL which will be £400+ When that breaks or inevitably is stuffed with limescale, pay for repairs. Parts and repairs likely to cost more than the entire cheapo shower, but there you go.
I would therefore personally feel that it comes down to whenever or not one feels that gthe Mira one is 'better enough' (in whatever sense) to justify the (probably considerably) increased cost - and I strongly suspect that I would personal decide that t was not justified. However, it's a pretty 'personal' thing.

