This is a photo from heritage house, which I know is somewhat controversial and I certainly don't agree with everything on there, BUT, if rising damp does exist as capillary action, why is there no sign of a "tide line" in a brick wall standing in water? I have my own opinions on this "1m up the wall" phenomenon - but for sure, not everyone agrees....
I've never really seen the point of that photo by Peter Ward, as much as a photo of a damp interior wall doesn't prove rising damp does exist. There was some work done by Ralph Burkinshaw, who is quite well respected in the trade. He managed to get the damp to rise about 8 courses, although he points out that brickwork standing in a tray of water isn't normal conditions for a wall.
