I listened to your link and am now confused.
That was not a problem because it was not symbolic of the subjugation of women.
Is it you who thinks it is a symbol of subjugation?
Kelvin should be allowed to air his views on the matter without fear of recrimination.
Did he just say she shouldn't have worn it in Nice or generally on television?
Your turban question is answered here
Well, not really; more dismissed because it is not muslim. Gaunt said the turban was an obligation and the hijab is not and even that there is nothing in the koran to say it is.
So, how is it a symbol of subjugation.
http://www.jongaunt.co.uk/
in Pod 1 – The Rant: Kelvin McKenzie & his hijab column.
He also makes the excellent point that Channel 4 News would not have sent her to Nice dressed like that.
Do you mean "would not" or "should not"?
If you meant "would not" then what are you implying? She wore it on purpose?
If you meant "should not" then why not; she is a reporter?
Are you afraid the unthinking masses will be upset?
As Gaunt said, some of the dead were muslim.
Did they not send catholic or protestant reporters to Ireland?
Do they not send English reporters to scenes of madness by English people?
Is everyone looking for things to complain about which aren't really there?
I did agree with Gaunt about the Establishment and Media in Britain pussy-footing around.
However, that returns me to a question I have been asking for a long time. Something strange is happening; what is it?