- Joined
- 10 Aug 2025
- Messages
- 2,243
- Reaction score
- 1,942
- Country

Extra police and prison resources.Free medical and dental treatment as well. That must be worth hundreds of pounds a month on it's own.
Bollards around public areas and buildings.

Extra police and prison resources.Free medical and dental treatment as well. That must be worth hundreds of pounds a month on it's own.

Better still, allow them to work, and allow them to become accepted and socialised into the community.They should be treated like prisoners then, not free to roam.
Oh dear, classic complete unawareness of unintended consequences of do-gooding, entirely in accordance with Labour/Liberal/Green party non-thinking.Better still, allow them to work, and allow them to become accepted and socialised into the community.

Do your homework:Oh dear, classic complete unawareness of unintended consequences of do-gooding, entirely in accordance with Labour/Liberal/Green party non-thinking.
Over 145 countries party to the 1951 Refugee Convention generally permit recognized refugees to work, with many offering rights similar to citizens. Key nations with robust employment pathways include Canada, Australia, Germany, Sweden, and Portugal. While regulations differ, many European nations, along with the USA and Canada, also allow asylum seekers to work after a waiting period, often 3 to 6 months.
Resort to the ridiculously extreme.Why do you think they're turning up? Do you not see any connection between the stuff and lifestyle the last lot got given and the next lot now wanting to leave their home country and come here? Where will it end - the entire third world living in the UK?

Which countries don't have borders?Those countries listed have borders.
I see that phrase a lot from weak minded RWR. What is wrong with doing good exactly? Are those opposed to do-gooders, do-badders?do-gooding
It's a reference to those who think they're doing good but are actually causing harm that their simple little brain can't comprehend.I see that phrase a lot from weak minded RWR. What is wrong with doing good exactly? Are those opposed to do-gooders, do-badders?

Who encourages them to do that?E.g. those who are encouraged by the free stuff to get in a boat, then die in the sea. They've been indirectly killed by well-meaning simpletons here.
You mean those trafficked by smugglers?those who are encouraged
No shít Sherlock.The people-smugglers are supplying a demand, from people who choose to pay them and get onto dangerous boats.
People smugglers just tell them it's easy, and they'll be looked after and everything will be ok because we have done it hundreds of times, blah..blah... and take money from the vulnerable. They are not do-gooders by any stretch. What makes you say they do good?Because well-meaning do-gooders wave huge rewards at them for trying
Me? No. Seems like you have just suggested it though. Some of the cleverest people on the planet have been scammed.Are you suggesting that Africans are too stupid to think for themselves, and simply get swept along by others?
Maybe you could tell us what you would do. You won't. You can’t.So do tell us, what EXACTLY would you do with immigrants/asylum seekers?
No if's, no but's...
Tell us what your EXPLICIT policy should be...
And how EXACTLY you would implement that policy!