Apologies, I should have linked. But I see someone already has now.where do we find that thread?
Kind Regards, John
Apologies, I should have linked. But I see someone already has now.where do we find that thread?
Kind Regards, John
Thanks, but, unless I'm missing something, that thread says exactly the same as this one. In particular, the OP said (in both threads) that the electrician "has somehow bypassed the issue". That could mean all sorts of things, although Risteard has assumed that it means that a satisfactorily-functioining safety device has been bypassed.
It is clear that he has given that other circuits disconnected when the fault was in place.Thanks, but, unless I'm missing something, that thread says exactly the same as this one. In particular, the OP said (in both threads) that the electrician "has somehow bypassed the issue". That could mean all sorts of things, although Risteard has assumed that it means that a satisfactorily-functioining safety device has been bypassed.
Indeed, even if Risteard's interpretation is correct, I'm not sure what else the electrician could have been expected to do on a freezing cold bank holiday. He did, after all, say that the problem needs to be sorted out properly "asap".
Kind Regards, John
Perhaps that is "clear" to you.It is clear that he has given that other circuits disconnected when the fault was in place. So the RCCB has clearly been bypassed.
So the RCCB has clearly been bypassed.[/QUOT
Unless you are related to Mystic Meg you clearly do not have that information !
Bored now,
DS
Well, in fairness I did say that it was obvious what he had done. But I am sorry that you have suffered at the hands of a dangerous cowboy contractor.Got hold of the electrician and he said it was the rcd he bypassed and theres a wiring issue but the breakers are still on....
You did, and at least two of us said that (although quite possible) it was far from "obvious". The fact that your assumption has proved to be correct does not alter that.Well, in fairness I did say that it was obvious what he had done.
As I said/asked before, what else could/should he have done? What would you have done (on a bank holiday)?But I am sorry that you have suffered at the hands of a dangerous cowboy contractor.
Certainly not bypassed a safety device which was functioning correctly. How could that possibly be condoned?What would you have done (on a bank holiday)?
So what would you have done? Nothing, perhaps?Certainly not bypassed a safety device which was functioning correctly.
If you carefully read all the facts (from start to finish) then there was no other conclusion to be drawn. Hence my suggestion that it was obvious. I suspect you and others may have overlooked some of the stated facts when reading through the thread(s), which meant that there was no other explanation.You did, and at least two of us said that (although quite possible) it was far from "obvious". The fact that your assumption has proved to be correct does not alter that.
Perhaps disconnected the faulty circuit for a start. Given that I haven't been to the premises it's a bit unfair to ask what specifically should have been done.So what would you have done? Nothing, perhaps?
Kind Regards, John
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local