Southport murderer pleads guilty

[noseall]

TBH, I've lost track of what you are arguing.

Typical incoherent RWR rambling, laced with dishonesty and lies.
Standard RWR, M.O.

 

[MNW67]

Why was he referred to Prevent then?

Because of his very strange behaviour. But they found no terrorist connection or any evidence of radicalisation at all. And none has been found in the six months since he carried out these horrendous murders.

 

[Deleted member 265726]

Because of his very strange behaviour. But they found no terrorist connection at all. And none has been found in the six months since he carried out these horrendous murders.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/get-help-if-youre-worried-about-someone-being-radicalised#:~:text=Anyone who is being radicalised,made to the Home Office.

 

[noseall]

Why was he referred to Prevent then?

You'd think they would find it, wouldn't you?
How did that go?

 

[MNW67]

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/get-help-if-youre-worried-about-someone-being-radicalised#:~:text=Anyone who is being radicalised,made to the Home Office.

That doesn't add much. What point are you making?

 

[noseall]

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/get-help-if-youre-worried-about-someone-being-radicalised#:~:text=Anyone who is being radicalised,made to the Home Office.

'Potential radicalisation'
What was the outcome?

 

[Deleted member 265726]

That doesn't add much. What point are you making?

That people suspected of being radicalised are referred to Prevent.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Starmer says this is a line in the sand, there will be changes.

Tough talk.

When it comes to crime, things are going from bad to worse. We've now reached a stage where folk can blatantly walk into a shop, scoop items into bags and walk out without fear of any comeback.

My reason for mentioning a type of crime at the other end of the scale is this. If the authorities can't routinely stop these crimes, how the feck are they going to stop things at the more heinous end?

I'll say again, he'd better get a WLT however I won't hold my breath.

 

[noseall]

That people suspected of being radicalised are referred to Prevent.

And how did that go?

 

[MNW67]

That people suspected of being radicalised are referred to Prevent.

And it was found on all three occasions that he wasn't at risk of being radicalised. Instead it was left to mental health services.

 

[Deleted member 265726]

And how did that go?

.

 

[MNW67]

And how did that go?

As it is supposed to. He was assessed and found not to be at risk of radicalisation. Instead it was left to mental health services. From what we now know, he should probably have been sectioned.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Someone on the phone-in to Nicky Campbell right now, saying in some ways the perpetrator is also a victim ...

 

[Deleted member 265726]

And it was found on all three occasions that he wasn't at risk of being radicalised . Instead it was left to mental health services.

What do you think drove him to do what he did if it wasn't radicalisation?

 

[noseall]

Badly.

Three times he was sent to the very people that are skilled In identifying radicalisation, and all three times they found no evidence.

Gotcha.