Experts said pushbacks are incompatible with International law.Not what they said.
Border force said it
Royal Navy said it
Maritime legal experts have said it
Tory govt in 2022 said it
Experts said pushbacks are incompatible with International law.Not what they said.

NotchyFacts™Experts said pushbacks are incompatible with International law.
Border force said it
Royal Navy said it
Maritime legal experts have said it
Tory govt in 2022 said it
Details, links, evidence have all been provided in this thread for the followingNotchyFacts™
no need to leave the ECHR then.Because Tony Blair's Human Rights Act went too far and has caused all sorts of problems.

Donations make little difference to public opinionbusinesses dont think Reform stand much chance of going anywhere
Farage in crisis as Tories raise twice as much as Reform in political donations
Kemi Badenoch’s Conservatives have attracted big-money donors even as they sink in the polls behind Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, official figures show
View attachment 384001

shows he is cutting out the rot. Good mangoodness me they are dropping like flies.............
Reform UK suspends Kent county councillor Daniel Taylor, who represents Cliftonville, ‘with immediate effect’
and he is being questioned by police
![]()
Reform suspends Kent county councillor ‘with immediate effect’
Reform UK has suspended one of its Kent county councillors, sparking calls for a by-election.www.kentonline.co.uk

some union reps commented and and some lawyers answered a different question.Details, links, evidence have all been provided in this thread for the following
Experts said pushbacks are incompatible with International law.
Border force said it
Royal Navy said it
Maritime legal experts have said it
Tory govt in 2022 said it

"likely" doing a lot of heavy lifting.Leaving the ECHR would be likely to mean UK loses international law enforcement and judicial cooperation in criminal justice matters.
So leaving ECHR will likely make it more difficult to investigate or deport foreign criminals
See A692 TCA
Or another boat for that matter. Dunno, but it would be illegal.Why would someone use force to endanger someone?
Irrelevant snippet, but thanks all the same.Changing a vessels course would not place it in any particular additional danger
Same as your yacht varnish induced hallucinations then.The boat does not know which way it's going

So use of force for any reason, if it results in a risk of injury is illegal? No matter what?Or another boat for that matter. Dunno, but it would be illegal.
Irrelevant snippet, but thanks all the same.
Same as your yacht varnish induced hallucinations then.![]()
Why are you asking me an irrelevant question?So use of force for any reason, if it results in a risk of injury is illegal? No matter what?

because you said..Why are you asking me an irrelevant question?
I wanted to check that you were suggesting a coastal state would be breaking the law if it took the necessary steps in its territorial sea to prevent passage which is not innocent.Dunno, but it would be illegal.