Starmer. Today’s the day.

[securespark]

The same was said about Boris and we all know what the result was.

Burnham proved his competence with results and Joris failed miserably.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

It's 09:10 and the podium is being set up outside no. 10.

So someone is coming out of the famous black door in the very near future to say something.

I don't think we need three guesses what's about to happen.

 

[Highway Man]

It's 09:10 and the podium is being set up outside no. 10.

So someone is coming out of the famous black door in the very near future to say something.

I don't think we need three guesses what's about to happen.

I would rather it be the cat to put a challenge in.

 

[blup]

He’s resigned

 

[Koolpc]

I would rather it be the cat to put a challenge in.

Cats could never rule.....

Reported

 

[King Billy]

Here you go again

Let’s see who takes over and see how they get on first.

After all it’s a mess of labours making that they need to sort out first

That'll be why the usual suspects have already been criticising, demonising, weaponising and generally blaming him.
It wouldn't make a jot of difference who the Labour leader is, they'll immediately become the targets for any slight chance to blame him or her for the problems of the 21st century.
That's because they play the personality politics game with their opponents as well as their preferred candidates.

Personality Politics is the usual basis for voting among Populist voters. The political policies are judged on the candidates personality, so gifted liars will become popular and be elected.

But often the opposition will just lie.

Starmer is not the knight in shining armour that all the Labour luvvies thought he would be.

when he started whittling about how to get out of Lockdown 3 weeks after it was imposed.

 

[King Billy]

He’s resigned

But he remains until his replacement is elected, if there is to be an election.

 

[Highway Man]

He’s resigned

The cat?

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

What does that indicate when compared to 5 Tory leaders in the same length of time?

Love how the Labour Luvvies think that saying the Tories are worse somehow makes Labour OK?!?

All based on the totally brainless concept that everyone has to take one side or the other.

Yeah, they're both terrible. No idea which takes the crown as worst, anyone with any sense doesn't care.

 

[Highway Man]

Only news I want to hear from Starmer is to tell us he is calling a general election.

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

Burnham has a proven track record of bringing together a multi-disciplined team with varying objectives.

He's a talentless waffler with a load of attitude and no principles or vision. Just another Starmer.

He's been in Manchester at what turned out to be a good period in time for the place. It was also doing well before he arrived, should he take credit for this too?

It's just not possible for anyone with anyone with any ideas about anything to run the Labour party, if they had an idea that pleased one faction of the party it would upset another. So they always end up with these please-everybody upset-nobody puppets who just talk waffle about nothing.

 

[Koolpc]

Well, we all knew his time was up...

 

[Highway Man]

FFS he thinks he is giving a speech at receiving an oscar. Pizz off and good riddance, what happened to " I won't walk away"

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

So... Place your bets... Coronation of Burnham or a leadership election?

I'm betting that sweet little boy Wesley will recognise he's got no chance, Burnham will give him an unimportant cabinet job to shut him up, nobody else will challenge and that will be it.

King Andy could be on his throne pretty quickly.

 

[Munroast]

what / where is this fantastic country with all the achievements he talked about ?