Starmer. Today’s the day.

He claimed he was going to. Did you see any evidence of him even trying?
Immigration numbers and removals have never looked better since Sir Keir took the top job.

Small boat arrivals you say - didn’t you vote for Brexit, my old turkey?
 
Immigration numbers and removals have never looked better since Sir Keir took the top job.
IMG_5338.gif


They only look better to the gangs.
 
"An economy that is stronger, growing faster than our peers" - In Q2 2025, the UK's growth rate matched or exceeded that of most other G7 nations, and on a half-year basis the UK led the G7. However, growth over the past 12 months amounted to a paltry 1.2%, and one being the fastest in the G7 was "like winning a beauty contest amongst your seven ageing friends." The claim was legitimate for parts of 2025 but is a selective framing of modest performance. By early 2026, UK GDP grew by 0.6% in Q1 2026.

"Wages rising faster than inflation in every single month since we came to power" - When unemployment rises and payrolled employment falls, wage averages can be skewed upward because it is often lower-paid workers who lose jobs first. The remaining workforce earns more on average, not because everyone got a raise, but partly because the lower-paid have left the sample. Starmer citing rising wages without acknowledging rising unemployment presents a selectively rosy picture of workers' actual conditions.

"Half a million children being lifted out of poverty because of the choices that I made" - The government's Child Poverty Strategy projected lifting 550,000 children out of relative poverty by 2030 — largely through scrapping the two-child benefit cap. However, this is a projected future outcome, not one yet realised.

"Small boat crossings falling" - Numbers fell in 2023 but rose again, with around 41,000 people detected in 2025 — higher than in 2024. crossings were higher in 2025 than when Labour took office.
 
Last edited:
Smashing the gangs. He didn’t.
...and never had any intention of doing. It was a vague soundbite that actually promised nothing, calculated bluff.

Burnham will be even worse. He's expressed concern about gimmegrants previously - he was worried that their accommodation isn't good enough and should be improved.

They're both open-border fanatics who want to fragment society so it's easier to rule over while importing spongers who are much more likely to vote Labour than the native population.
 
Starmer confirms he intends to stay on as an MP. I always find that bit of HoP a bit surreal, one week you're at the dispatch box, the next you're on the back benches.
 
It's money for nothing, why would anyone turn it down voluntarily?

I doubt he'll regularly turn up, he'll just keep collecting the money to stack up with his lifetime PM pension and all the rest.
 
And now you’ll get no response. Carry on wasting your time.
So there was no lie, and your response to y question was not a suitable response.
And spineless has avoided answering, so he lied, not Starmer. And you attempted to divert the question and lack of answer with pointless replies. :rolleyes:
For spineless benefit, I'll ask again ,but like you I suspect he'll have no answer.
What was the lie?
 
Back
Top