- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,383
- Reaction score
- 2,128
- Country
I'm asking you a question - this is why there is a question mark at the end.
Sue Gray
- Thread starter JohnD
- Start date
Sponsored Links
This is laughably transparent. There isn't even a proper finding. The government were advised not to publish the report by the Cabinet Office. To do so is purely political. The former head of the government legal service, under Cameron, May and Johnson said:
The only reason the Tories have published, is that they are trying desperately to fan the embers of the Sue Gray inquiry conspiracy, in an attempt to keep some low information Boris numpties on side.
The only reason the Tories have published, is that they are trying desperately to fan the embers of the Sue Gray inquiry conspiracy, in an attempt to keep some low information Boris numpties on side.
And - timelines notwithstanding - someone else would have had to step up, find out the FACTS about the lying charlatan you hornsmoke so willingly, and report them.
Desperate.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,383
- Reaction score
- 2,128
- Country
So you don't want to answer the question then ?
Another Labour fanboy says "no comment".
Sue Gray report press officer was moved after leaks and briefings
A senior Civil Service press officer responsible for handling the publication of Sue Gray's report was dramatically dropped from the role last night.
Last week, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) said it had been given no evidence that Gray breached the code, although this was a matter for the government to decide.
Sue Gray was found to have apparently breached the civil service code by discussing a role with Keir Starmer without telling her Whitehall bosses, a Cabinet Office investigation has found. Jeremy Quin, a Cabinet Office minister, said a civil inquiry found a “prima facie” breach of the code about outside interests to be clear and transparent – meaning an apparent contravention of the rules based on first impressions.
“The statement says the rules are ‘clear’ and ‘the facts speak for themselves’. But nothing is proved (a ‘prima facie’ case only). Is it really clear that the rules apply to informal/personal contacts, not about government business, but about a possible future job?”
“Acoba has approved the appointment. They received no evidence that government business was discussed, or that there was any effect on Sue Gray’s impartiality while she remained in government service.”
I'm sure Roo-boy will read between the lines and come up with a conspiracy theory but without further evidence he can whistle in the wind for all it's worth. Suck it up.
Sue Gray was found to have apparently breached the civil service code by discussing a role with Keir Starmer without telling her Whitehall bosses, a Cabinet Office investigation has found. Jeremy Quin, a Cabinet Office minister, said a civil inquiry found a “prima facie” breach of the code about outside interests to be clear and transparent – meaning an apparent contravention of the rules based on first impressions.
“The statement says the rules are ‘clear’ and ‘the facts speak for themselves’. But nothing is proved (a ‘prima facie’ case only). Is it really clear that the rules apply to informal/personal contacts, not about government business, but about a possible future job?”
“Acoba has approved the appointment. They received no evidence that government business was discussed, or that there was any effect on Sue Gray’s impartiality while she remained in government service.”
I'm sure Roo-boy will read between the lines and come up with a conspiracy theory but without further evidence he can whistle in the wind for all it's worth. Suck it up.
Does it change anything towards lying, deceitful, dishonest scumbag Boris?
No. Cry all you like boyo.
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
