This changed everything
Note the firm specialised in fitting automated gates, not an electrician fitting a kit, and before that I had fitted automated gates, garage doors etc. After that case, it all stopped for most firms, not sure if this was good, as it left a gap which some less responsible firms have filled, and we hear on these pages about garage doors with no access should the power fail.
Sorry yes, once someone asks advice, we assume they have asked because they don't know, so are not trained in that field, there are of course exceptions, and you do seem to understand the risks, personally I would still not fit them on my own property, as simply not insured. I could not afford a £50k fine if I got it wrong. I know the
BBC account does blame the fitters for not reading the instructions, but court cases always seem to say that, and I am sure the installers thought they had done it correct until the accident.
I watched my father-in-law with his garage door, theory was good, practice he had the fob for closing the door just inside the house door, and would not monitor it closing, so it sometimes failed to close, and sometimes trapped cats. That was down to how he used it, not poor installation.
Let's face it, if we could anticipate what we have done could cause an accident we would not do it. It's the things we never thought could happen, and I would want insurance to cover that.
Eyes wide open is the term, and yes already aware of this very sad case and many more.
A case in example in fact on this occassion Hormann doors, i decided to go for a reputable make and use a 'Horman Dealer' to install.
The site survey caused me some concern but i instead attempted to ignore my OCD nags.
The fitters arrived and messed up the install made some very rudimentary errors and left. I enquired to Hormann direct, to which it transpired this company was not a registered supplier but in fact buying off one, to which they were fully aware. When i pressed them further on the standards and safety issues raised this was their reply:
"Firstly, I have to state that we do not sell our products to the general public and only through our approved Trade Partners. When end consumers do contact us over any queries or concerns we can we can only work closely with the Trade Partner on giving advice, guidance and support to come to a resolution that suits all. Ultimately, as your contract is with them we have to let them take the lead and decide what is best for all parties involved."
Can you actually believe that reply? No i couldn't either. It happens time over, i had the same issue with a well known plumbing trade association, again 'safety is of paramount concern' is absolutely not the case, one of their 'fully paid members' could have killed one of my youngsters due to dangerous wiring. When i presented the case in question no action was taken despite a written report from a qualified electrician and manufacturer of the boiler installer report.
Whilst i agree your point you are making you wouldn't want to risk a fine for killing/injuring someone after being found negligent. However, be aware, and this is something unfortunely i have had to explain to too many companies too many times, If you're negligent, meaning you failed to follow safety standards, ignored risks, or made a poor installation decision that caused harm, you are personally liable, regardless of certification. You will find in this situation insurance companies can also be adept in sidestepping any liability.
So it boils down to, paying someone else, relieving yourself of the worry that IF the gate ends up chopping your loved one or someone else in half, at least you don't have to pay the fine?
Or oversee that the gate has been installed correctly and has absolutely followed all risk mitigation steps to minimise any eventual outcome that could be life changing to the injured person/fitter, ive been here many times requesting additional information on missing checks or controls, ive had tradesmen walk away, quite a few times, why? Because in their eyes they only ever priced the job on their standards and not necessarily what the customer should be rightly recieve as an end product.
On another sad note i see a 787 dreamliner has crashed with many lost souls, looks on paper to be something simple like Flaps were not extended despite landing gear down, a glaring obvious mistake that trained pilots and rigourous process should have never allowed, unfortunely most of the time despite all the training and certification, these incidents are normally human error(i am not blaming the pilots but right now i would bet on human error)