Tommy Robinson flees UK

you don’t need to “not defend yourself” if you are the aggressor.


Only Tommy says he was defending himself, eyewitnesses don’t say that
So what do you think the eye witnesses said ?
 
So what do you think the eye witnesses said ?
Eye witness says they were arguing and suddenly Tommy Robinson punched the guy.

That’s not self defence boyo.

To prove self defence he would have to show there was violence against him.


Poor MAGA gas112, wrong again


 
Eye witness says they were arguing and suddenly Tommy Robinson punched the guy.

That’s not self defence boyo.

To prove self defence he would have to show there was violence against him.


Poor MAGA gas112, wrong again


eye witness never just said that notch lying as per usual .
And what do you actually mean by violence used against him
 
Notchy is lying.

Imagine him on a jury with Tommy as the guy in the dock!
 
I think the eye witness said he saw a heated argument and then TR punched the older man.
Its the new form of political debate in 21st century Britain, challenge me verbally and I will punch your lights out. It's drunken Saturday night one punch manslaughter territory.
 
I wonder what it is folk like Laxley-Lennon actually want? What is his objective? If asked, what would he say? What would resolution look like to folk like Laxley-Lennon in terms of the UKs ills?

I suspect the answer is, he doesn't actually desire any sort of proper long term resolution to these issues.

People like Laxley-Lennon are stirrers, nothing more nothing less. Sad thing is folk fall for it.
 
I think the eye witness said he saw a heated argument and then TR punched the older man.
I think the "older man" description is up for dispute also. It sounds like its all part of a narrative -attacked - fled -boarded a plane early hours,- left the country - arrested at airport. TR is 42 himself - if an OAP 70 attacks another OAP that is 71 people dont say he attacked an older man do they. And actually when ever has that phrase been used in reporting an attack.
 
Its the new form of political debate in 21st century Britain, challenge me verbally and I will punch your lights out. It's drunken Saturday night one punch manslaughter territory.
Like this
 
I think the "older man" description is up for dispute also. It sounds like its all part of a narrative -attacked - fled -boarded a plane early hours,- left the country - arrested at airport. TR is 42 himself - if an OAP 70 attacks another OAP that is 71 people dont say he attacked an older man do they. And actually when ever has that phrase been used in reporting an attack.

I think the other man was 64. It was the eye witness who described him as an older man.
 
Surprise surprise.
Surprise surprise that denso selectively edits my words to create his own narrative - didn’t the MODS warn about this kind of behaviour.
My actual words mean something different
It sounds like its all part of a narrative
 
Back
Top