Tommy Robinson flees UK

[diy_fun_uk]

If your'e right you can point out such statements, or identify them

It's very lazy to assert that because some people want the problem to be recognised as processing and action, that that means they want more to arrive.

Eh?

What?!?

Over the past few years, on numerous news progs, whether it's a talking head in the studio or a member of the public being interviewed e.g. on a march/protest, I've seen more than a few people make comment that 'we don't even take as much in as ...' or 'the numbers we take in are very low ...' or 'the UK is number x on a list of all EU countries, hardly something to be proud of ...' etc. Those sorts of comments.

The assertion these people are making is the UK could be taking more.

If you think I'm going to trawl through YT and/or iPlayer etc to find specific clips just to appease you, you're in for a long wait

Here's another one for you. Without seeking any actual proof/stats, I can confidently say of all those not working and claiming benefits, there will be a fair few that could work but are perfectly happy not to. I don't need to provide stats, logic tells me I'm right.

Just as I'm right to say, in the UK, from our population of 69 MILLION, there will be a fair few who'd be more than happy for us to take more illegals in.

I'm right, so deal with it.

 

[Notch7]

.

 

[denso13]

The assertion these people are making is the UK could be taking more.

No, they are pointing out that it isn't the problem some suggest, i.e., we are too soft so they all come here.

 

[Notch7]

I can confidently say of all those not working and claiming benefits, there will be a fair few that could work but are perfectly happy not to. I don't need to provide stats, logic tells me I'm right

You do need to define what you mean by “a fair few”

If you don’t you are creating a narrative that all people on benefits are scroungers

 

[diy_fun_uk]

You do need to define what you mean by “a fair few”

If you don’t you are creating a narrative that all people on benefits are scroungers

4.295107% of registered voters.

 

[noseall]

i am not stupid.

 

[Notch7]

I've seen more than a few people make comment that 'we don't even take as much in as ...' or 'the numbers we take in are very low ...' or 'the UK is number x on a list of all EU countries, hardly something to be proud of ...' etc. Those sorts of comments.

The assertion these people are making is the UK could be taking more

That’s your assertion not theirs.

 

[noseall]

it is hardly likely he would get a fair trial

What makes you say that?

so I don't blame him even if he was justified.

On the basis of the outcome of a trial?

 

[Munroast]

Waffle.

You clearly stated you think he won't get a fair trial.
Q. Why won't he?

Let's see if the bell end can answer his spurious claims, sans waffle.

when someone is so widely known can they ever get a fair jury trial ?
in the case of yaxley, probably 90% of the jury will no of him, and 90% of them will probably detest him - there is only extremists seem to like him, and the chances of getting several extremists onto a random jury must be like winning the lottery 2 weeks in a row

so imo no he would not get a fair jury trial

 

[motorbiking]

I would certainly be prejudice against him based on what I have read in the press.

 

[aveatry]

I have never had and still have no interest in watching a lying convicted thug preach to his morons, no.

Another lefty too scared to listen to another angle and just soaks up what the media tells him - same with covid same with climate.

 

[denso13]

and just soaks up what the media tells him

Going by his criminal record probably.

Another lefty too scared to listen to another angle

Did you believe the Manchester airport gang when they said they were innocent?

 

[aveatry]

Going by his criminal record probably.

Did you believe the Manchester airport gang when they said they were innocent?

You are not making any point here because I have not said I believe TR I am just saying I like to look at all angles and some people seem too scared to.
Have you watched interview with him ?

 

[denso13]

Have you watched interview with him ?

I watched a bit of it, just like anyone protesting their innocence really.

 

[blup]

I would certainly be prejudice against him based on what I have read in the press.

You would presumably listen to the evidence. Juries are are human and humans are prejudiced, They are asked to put aside their previous knowledge and any views of the case. Many celebrities or high profile defendants have turned fame or notoriety to their advantage to get off in the face the evidence. Yaxo seems to positively court controversy, it can’t do him any favours going through his side if the story in such detail.