C cantaloup63 7 Jan 2012 #31 joe-90 said: But at the time of the 'crime; you had no intent so could not be guilty. This reminds me of that other thread. (but you agree this time) Click to expand... I acted solely, and not as part of a gang which had murderous intent
joe-90 said: But at the time of the 'crime; you had no intent so could not be guilty. This reminds me of that other thread. (but you agree this time) Click to expand... I acted solely, and not as part of a gang which had murderous intent
R RedHerring2 7 Jan 2012 #32 joe-90 said: But at the time of the 'crime; you had no intent so could not be guilty. Click to expand... When I was done for speeding, I genuinely thought it was a 40 limit, it used to be. I had no intention of speeding. I still had to pay the fixed penalty.
joe-90 said: But at the time of the 'crime; you had no intent so could not be guilty. Click to expand... When I was done for speeding, I genuinely thought it was a 40 limit, it used to be. I had no intention of speeding. I still had to pay the fixed penalty.
joe-90 Joined 28 Oct 2005 Messages 31,280 Reaction score 1,999 Country 7 Jan 2012 #33 As I said earlier. Driving offences are the only 'intent' free crime. It is your duty to be aware.
R RedHerring2 7 Jan 2012 #35 Manslaughter, i.e involuntary manslaughter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaughter_in_English_law
joe-90 Joined 28 Oct 2005 Messages 31,280 Reaction score 1,999 Country 7 Jan 2012 #36 That's what the Eltham 2 should have been charged with.
enyam Joined 24 Sep 2011 Messages 2,249 Reaction score 178 Location Devon Country 7 Jan 2012 #37 joe-90 said: That's what the Eltham 2 should have been charged with. Click to expand... Well they weren't so get over it.
joe-90 said: That's what the Eltham 2 should have been charged with. Click to expand... Well they weren't so get over it.
joe-90 Joined 28 Oct 2005 Messages 31,280 Reaction score 1,999 Country 7 Jan 2012 #38 They will get over it. Just a matter of time.