Where have they gone?

But you vote Tory or reform

Now who is it that what they say doesn't agree with what this chart says.

Either you lied through your teeth on the questions or you don't understand cons and reform
because I cannot stand Nanny statism and Labour and lib dems are top of the charts when it comes to interfering in people's lives.
 
because I cannot stand Nanny statism and Labour and lib dems are top of the charts when it comes to interfering in people's lives.
What you mean is you don’t like legislation and public services that help poor people.

You want unfettered capitalism so the rich can get richer by exploiting the poor.


Good effort at trying to make it sound like it’s about Nanny statism eh :ROFLMAO:
 
Wasn't the only thing she said was it
what else did she say?
And she admitted guilt.
Unfortunately, she took bad legal advice from an unknown Duty Sol and confessed under caution. Her options were limited.
Lock her up, no issue. Lock the farage opponent guy up too. Same cell wouldn't bother me
12 month suspension - particularly when you look at what Punchy Mike Aimesbury got, for actually beating someone to the ground in an unprovoked physical attack.
 
What you mean is you don’t like legislation and public services that help poor people.

You want unfettered capitalism so the rich can get richer by exploiting the poor.


Good effort at trying to make it sound like it’s about Nanny statism eh :ROFLMAO:
Can you ever have a sensible discussion? You always have to play the feckwit

LibDems like silly traffic calming schemes that serve no purpose other than frustrate people. They can't win anyway, so it's a waste of time to vote for them.
labour seem to think that wealthy people got their money exploiting the poor. They seem happy to grow the state without considering the impact on jobs
I want a country that can compete on the global scale. I'd like some wealthy high tax payers to be attracted to residing in the UK, so they can pay in to the UK.
I don't particularly get upset that 43% of my income goes in tax, I don't have much time for people who pay <10% suggesting I should pay more.
 
But you vote Tory or reform

Now who is it that what they say doesn't agree with what this chart says.

Either you lied through your teeth on the questions or you don't understand cons and reform

According to your answers our politics are very similar but you call me left wing but admit you are are right wing. You must be if cons/reform is your choice

MBK isn't concerned about what he is.

Only about the label "right wing".

Same as Windy isn't bothered about having the behaviours, prejudices and traits of a gammon, only about the term.
 
Grifting is a verb: the actions of a grifter.

Lee Anderson is a good example…..looks less honest than a back street car salesman
What is the definition of a grifter?

A grifter is a con artist: someone who swindles people out of money through fraud. If there's one type of person you don't want to trust, it's a grifter: someone who cheats others out of money.
 
MBK isn't concerned about what he is.

Only about the label "right wing".

Same as Windy isn't bothered about having the behaviours, prejudices and traits of a gammon, only about the term.
Of course its easy to want the state to provide us with more, safe in the knowledge that we aren't the ones paying.
 
LibDems like silly traffic calming schemes that serve no purpose other than frustrate people

A sweeping statement; such schemes are likely very welcomed by some (many?) but this group is easily drowned out by the naysayers (ably supported by our predominantly RW meeja).

Besides, as a (former?) cyclist yourself, would you not cycle more, perhaps even commute by cycle, if the route was safer and generally more pleasant? I know that I would, and I reckon there would be many more who share my view.
They can't win anyway, so it's a waste of time to vote for them.

I tend to agree, but that is as much a failing of our FPTP electoral system as it is of the Lib Dems.
Unless you think that parties foremost aim should be getting elected, and saying whatever cobblers (they don't intend ever to go through with) gets them into office? Like Farage does.

labour seem to think that wealthy people got their money exploiting the poor.


"Seem".

Another way of expressing the above is that "the wealthy got where they are because the system that enabled this did so at a significant cost to others".
Not all wealthy are exploitative; some took those that worked with on the journey too, and they all benefitted.
Not all wealthy are grafters; some inherited it, some got lucky through nepotism, old boy networks, got a house that skyrocketed in value.

I want a country that can compete on the global scale. I'd like some wealthy high tax payers to be attracted to residing in the UK, so they can pay in to the UK.

I agree. One part of attracting the wealthy is making the country attractive.
If a wealthy person wants to live in splendid isolation in a gated estate in Surrey, they might as well do that somewhere with better weather, or scenery.
I don't particularly get upset that 43% of my income goes in tax, I don't have much time for people who pay <10% suggesting I should pay more.

I agree, when these are avoiding or evading their fair tax.
For those who have to choose between heat or eat though, that's a different story.
 
Of course its easy to want the state to provide us with more, safe in the knowledge that we aren't the ones paying.

Read my later post, for more flesh on the bones.

You just want to reduce everything to soundbites and one-liners, when it is a lot more nuanced than that.
If it wasn't, we'd have solved it all by now.
 
So you wouldn't ridicule anybody for supporting greens, labour, snp, sinn fein, etc etc

Or it's ok as long as people agree with your view that if the politician makes you smile then he is the right 1 ?

Ok
You’ve got a very strange way of asking a question. It’s a bizarre way to communicate
 
Back
Top