I'll just leave this here for himmy and the others.

[Dan Robinson]

For thine the Kingdom, the gas rate, and the tightness test for ever and ever. Amen.


Oh schit. Hymen will probably hunk me taking the lord's prayer as religionist too.

I'll standby for the wrath of the Vatican and Mecca as well as Crapita. Next week is going to be a right schitstorm.

I'm going to blame you. It's what disciples are for.


Don't worry though. When the Picardy come to get you just say my name thrice and I shall come down from upon High and smite them.

 

[Ihavenojob]

If I were to accuse Transam of being a gormless f*ckwit - would that be abuse?

That would be the pot calling the kettle black.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Calling the kettle WHAT? You can't say that.

 

[Ihavenojob]

ethnic

 

[Himaginn]

Dimagain has failed to demonstrate any of his accusations, .............

I did discuss before about whether you gave your comment any thought before making it. You claimed you did, well, now that you obviously are aware of the potential to be offensive with that comment, why not make the same comment again. This time you would be fully aware of the potential to offend, will you be intentionally offensive?

I also discussed before about the eventuality of being inadvertently offensive, accepting it, and moving on with the recognition of the mistake and determined not to make the same mistake again.
All we've had from you is a torrent of extreme abuse and threats of violence (from your colleagues also), a bland denial that your comment was offensive and some attempt at credibility that you can't be racist because your partner is foreign.

It is understandable that you may think you can't be racist because you have a foreign partner, but that doesn't make you infallible. It doesn't give you an insight into all things potentially racist. It obviously doesn't prevent you from being abusive.

I suggested you seek some independently-minded counsel. Just as Casgoigne thought that his remark was just a joke, but found to be racially offensive, so your comment would be considered racially offensive by independently-minded people.

 

[blightymam]

I did discuss before about whether you gave your comment any thought before making it. You claimed you did, well, now that you obviously are aware of the potential to be offensive with that comment, why not make the same comment again. This time you would be fully aware of the potential to offend, will you be intentionally offensive?

I also discussed before about the eventuality of being inadvertently offensive, accepting it, and moving on with the recognition of the mistake and determined not to make the same mistake again.
All we've had from you is a torrent of extreme abuse and threats of violence (from your colleagues also), a bland denial that your comment was offensive and some attempt at credibility that you can't be racist because your partner is foreign.

It is understandable that you may think you can't be racist because you have a foreign partner, but that doesn't make you infallible. It doesn't give you an insight into all things potentially racist. It obviously doesn't prevent you from being abusive.

I suggested you seek some independently-minded counsel. Just as Casgoigne thought that his remark was just a joke, but found to be racially offensive, so your comment would be considered racially offensive by independently-minded people.

The only person to think Dan's idiom was offensive was you. It wasn't even remotely in the same league as a washed up footie drunk's comments so to compare the two is a massive overreaction on your behalf - again.

You need to learn what is offensive and what isn't then be a bit less patronising and lecture less. Then perhaps someone may, just may, not be 'abusive' towards you in response.

 

[AGAS]

Himaginn

Well my post got erased so ill ask again ( not surprising ) , HEY HIMMY ,THIS IS A DIY FORUM WHICH PEOPLE GIVE HELPFUL ADVICE AND TIME BUT IN YOUR 2860 POSTS OF DRIVEL THERE IS NO HELP OFFERED , WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ???????AND WHERE IS YOUR DIY ADVICE ??????????? YOU TROLL

you freely use the term CCC , as asked before what do you think it means ??????????????????? stop avoiding the questions as you constantly blame
Dan Robinson for doing( which he isn't ) so be a man (or parasite ) and answer these three question asked if you can manage it for a constructive discussion ( as you may put it )

 

[blightymam]

HEY HIMMY ,THIS IS A DIY FORUM WHICH PEOPLE GIVE HELPFUL ADVICE AND TIME BUT IN YOUR 2860 POSTS OF DRIVEL THERE IS NO HELP OFFERED , WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ???????AND WHERE IS YOUR DIY ADVICE ??????????? YOU TROLL

You could also ask the same of all his other user names here over the years. I think it's just many a year spent trolling.
He won't answer tho, he never does when someone posts a valid point against him.

 

[Himaginn]

You could also ask the same of all his other user names here over the years. I think it's just many a year spent trolling.
He won't answer tho, he never does when someone posts a valid point against him.

How does being helpful in one sphere excuse racism/abuse in another?
Simple answer, it doesn't and can never do so!


Before you explore the suggestion of whether I've been banned before, consider the possible reasons I would have been banned before, if it was true.
I've always opposed and exposed racism whenever I've encountered it.
If I've been banned before it would obviously have been for opposing and exposing racism.
If I've been banned before, have I suffered extreme and excessive abuse for opposing and exposing racism? How can suffering abuse be a sensible reason to ban someone? How can opposing racism be a sensible reason to ban someone?
If I've been banned before, does it deter me from opposing and exposing racism? Will it deter me from opposing and exposing racism?
Additionally, the abusive/racist posters are allowed to continue being abusive/racist, or are allowed to rejoin to continue their abusive/racist comments, many of them being Gas Safe registered plumbers, or the same one/few.
Is this a sensible avenue to explore?


Furthermore, despite your claim to not be a racist, whenever, and wherever I accuse anyone of racism, you jump in to argue their comment was not racist, despite many of them being deleted. Are you therefore denying that there is racism frequently displayed in this forum? If there is, and in my mind it is not in doubt, will you be eager to argue that none of it is racist? Are you intentionally trying to raise the threshold of what is considered racism? That would be pointless, especially in your case because, may I remind you, that your judgement is extremely suspect due to your willingness to resort, all too readily, to abusive expletives, and thanking/liking others' abusive posts.

 

[blightymam]

How does being helpful in one sphere excuse racism/abuse in another?
Simple answer, it doesn't and can never do so!


Before you explore the suggestion of whether I've been banned before, consider the possible reasons I would have been banned before, if it was true.
I've always opposed and exposed racism whenever I've encountered it.
If I've been banned before it would obviously have been for opposing and exposing racism.
If I've been banned before, have I suffered extreme and excessive abuse for opposing and exposing racism? How can suffering abuse be a sensible reason to ban someone? How can opposing racism be a sensible reason to ban someone?
If I've been banned before, does it deter me from opposing and exposing racism? Will it deter me from opposing and exposing racism?
Additionally, the abusive/racist posters are allowed to continue being abusive/racist, or are allowed to rejoin to continue their abusive/racist comments, many of them being Gas Safe registered plumbers, or the same one/few.
Is this a sensible avenue to explore?


Furthermore, despite your claim to not be a racist, whenever, and wherever I accuse anyone of racism, you jump in to argue their comment was not racist, despite many of them being deleted. Are you therefore denying that there is racism frequently displayed in this forum? If there is, and in my mind it is not in doubt, will you be eager to argue that none of it is racist? Are you intentionally trying to raise the threshold of what is considered racism? That would be pointless, especially in your case because, may I remind you, that your judgement is extremely suspect due to your willingness to resort, all too readily, to abusive expletives, and thanking/liking others' abusive posts.

IF you've been banned before, lol. Make that WHEN. Reasons why? I guess because you're a bit of a troll. I've read a few posts of yours when your previous names have come up in conversations and it doesn't matter what subject, you argued in it, not just racism. You just like arguing. Nothing wrong with that, but there is when you then get upset if people are abusive or argue back. 'Diddums' is the word that springs to mind when you get upset.

I will always stick up for those who have been accused by you as being racist when they are not racist. ELF, Dan and myself have all been called racist by you and that was incorrect, you admitted ELF's and my own (eventually). You were just throwing your toys out the pram.

And again, same old tune. Shame you can't get it through your thick head, call people racists and they will clam up, build a wall against you and never enter into conversation. Way to go if you actually want to challenge such views. You deliberately refuse to get it, you don't stop your silly behaviour and this again shows me that you're just trolling. If you think my challenging you is sticking up for racists then it again shows your lack of ability to tell the difference of someone who simply doesn't like your style of conversing and someone who is truly racist. Same that you presume that every thread that gets deleted is down to racist comments, more the fact that they have descended into petty squabbling. A fact that is often proven when a Mod actually writes that on some posts that have been deleted.

You presume an awful lot and have a lot of difficulty in telling the difference between fact and your presumptions.

 

[oph]

Himagainn............ I just think you're a tool..... end of.

 

[JohnD]

IF you've been banned before, lol. Make that WHEN. Reasons why? I guess because you're a bit of a troll.

You're thinking of the user currently using the name Foxtrot Oscar, right?

 

[blightymam]

You're thinking of the user currently using the name Foxtrot Oscar, right?

Well no, I was writing to Himmy. Sorry you had difficulty with that but I thought it was clear.

 

[Himaginn]

ELF, Dan and myself have all been called racist by you and that was incorrect, you admitted ELF's and my own (eventually).

Please draw our attention to my post that accused you and/or Elfi of being racist, and if it exists I'll justify it.

I absolutely accuse you of claiming to not be a racist but your behaviour constantly and repeatedly contradicts your claim.

 

[Himaginn]

Well no, I was writing to Himmy. Sorry you had difficulty with that but I thought it was clear.

If you're writing to me, and only me, wouldn't it be sensible to use the PM facility?